EDUCATING COMMUNITIES THROUGH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: THE ROLE OF COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN COMMUNITY CAPACITY BUILDING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6242Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Collaborative Governance, Community Education, Community Capacity Building, Rural DevelopmentAbstract
Corporate Social Responsibility is increasingly framed as a community education and capacity building strategy rather than short-term assistance. Collaborative governance is crucial in shaping participation, learning continuity, and sustainability. This study examines how CSR is enacted through collaborative governance and how it influences community capacity building in Padang Lawas Regency. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observation, and document analysis involving corporate actors, village governments, public service providers, youth organisations, educational institutions, and community members. Analysis focused on governance dynamics and community learning processes within CSR practices. CSR implementation remains predominantly assistance-oriented, emphasising charitable and infrastructure programmes that reinforce transactional relations and limit sustained social learning. Collaborative governance is weakly institutionalised, with centralised corporate decision-making, administrative village roles, and beneficiary-based community participation. As a result, community learning is fragmented, short-lived, and weakly institutionalised, while collaboration with public health services produces only ad hoc learning effects. The study conceptualises CSR as a CSR-Based Community Learning Ecosystem dependent on facilitative leadership, institutional design, and sustained collaboration. Strengthening CSR as community education requires deliberative spaces, locally grounded learning pathways, and measurable capacity outcomes to support durable community capability.
References
Ali, S. M. S., Goutam, S., Vishweswar, S. V. N., Narasimha, M. H., Pavan, V., Guruprasad, D. D. R., & Sarma, S. (2025). Corporate social responsibility: Bridging management practices and community development. Scientific Culture, 11(3), 1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11325133
Aliangan, A. L. (2025). The little red schoolhouse project to enhance the rural education through community engagement in the Philippines. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026217
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation: A strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765381
Apriliani, R., Cassana, R. R. B., & Ramadhani, D. S. (2025). CSR communication in realizing a sustainable environment in Indonesian. Sociologia y Tecnociencia, 15(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.2.2025.195-212
Birgel, V., Decker, L., Roding, D., & Walter, U. (2023). Community capacity for prevention and health promotion: A scoping review on underlying domains and assessment methods. Systematic Reviews, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02314-1
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Domingo, A., Yessis, J., Zupko, B., McEachern, L. W., Valaitis, R., Skinner, K., & Hanning, R. M. (2024). Scale up of the learning circles: A participatory action approach to support local food systems in four diverse First Nations school communities within Canada. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19391-z
Dressel, S., Sjolander-Lindqvist, A., Johansson, M., Ericsson, G., & Sandstrom, C. (2021). Achieving social and ecological outcomes in collaborative environmental governance: Good examples from Swedish moose management. Sustainability, 13(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2020). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779
Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2025). Corporate social responsibility for sustainable development: A systematic review of business contributions to address global challenges. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 13(2), 6–39. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2025-13-2-6-39
Fanida, E. H., & Ladiqi, S. (2024). Collaborative governance in the village Prior Learning Recognition (PLR) program to support the achievement of village Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). E3S Web of Conferences, 568. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456804013
Flick, U. (2022). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278
Guillen-Godoy, M., Peralta-Gamboa, D., & Guillen-Godoy, E. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility and its impact on community health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040531
Guo, T., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., & Robertson, G. P. (2025). Building ties at multi-stakeholder engagement events to facilitate social learning about contentious issues in natural resource management. Agriculture and Human Values, 42(2), 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10648-2
Haque, A. (2023). CSR through responsible leadership for sustainable community development: A developing nation perspective. In CSR, sustainability, ethics and governance (Vol. 681, pp. 29–45). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27512-8_3
Heidarzadeh, A., Farrokhi, M., Bazyar, J., & Pourvakhshoori, N. (2025). Capacity of social institutions: Towards participation in community-centered management programs. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_248_24
Hendrayani, Y., Zen, I. S., & Maryam, S. (2025). Nglanggeran village: A model for sustainable tourism through multi-stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251363672
Hennchen, E., & Schrempf-Stirling, J. (2021). Fit for addressing grand challenges? A process model for effective accountability relationships within multi-stakeholder initiatives in developing countries. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 30(S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12325
Hovardas, T. (2021). Social sustainability as social learning: Insights from multi-stakeholder environmental governance. Sustainability, 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147744
Khan, M., Behrendt, K., Papadas, D., Arnold, L., & Sultana, A. (2025). From inequalities to inclusion: Sustainable development for smallholders. Sustainable Development, 33(S1), 1520–1536. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70073
Khiawnoi, P., Nakudom, S. S., Noobutr, P., & Kaewzang, U. (2025). Empowering communities: The strategic role of community enterprise entrepreneurs in sustainable development. Sustainability, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125483
Klein, L., & Graham, K. W. (2025). Implementation of a community-engaged learning program: An institutional perspective. In Practical applications of experiential and community-engaged learning methods in business (Vol. 1, pp. 34–48). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035315079.00011
Mabetha, D., Ojewola, T., van der Merwe, M., Mabika, R., Goosen, G., Sigudla, J., Hove, J., Witter, S., & D'Ambruoso, L. (2023). Realising radical potential: Building community power in primary health care through participatory action research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01894-7
McIlwain, L., Baird, J., Baldwin, C. L., Pickering, G. J., Manathunga, C., & Smith, T. F. (2024). Understanding the complex power dynamics that shape collaboration and social learning in multi-stakeholder water governance. Ecology and Society, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15109-290331
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Milhem, M., Ateeq, A., Ateeq, R. A., Shafie, D. I., Santhanamery, T., & Al Astal, A. (2025). Bridging worlds: Envisioning a sustainable future through CSR in developing countries. In Studies in systems, decision and control (Vol. 566, pp. 285–293). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71318-7_27
Mohapatra, B. (2024). Exploring barriers to corporate social responsibility policy and practices in India: An empirical analysis. SN Business and Economics, 4(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00761-z
Prutzer, M., Morf, A., & Nolbrant, P. (2021). Social learning: Methods matter but facilitation and supportive context are key — Insights from water governance in Sweden. Water, 13(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172335
Reji, E. M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in rural development: Insights from CSR initiatives of a public sector company. Journal of Rural Development, 42(4), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2023/v42/i4/172947
Rosario, A. T., & Boechat, A. C. (2025). How sustainable leadership can leverage sustainable development. Sustainability, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083499
Roy, R., & Marsafawy, H. E. (2021). Bridging recognition of prior learning (RPL) and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Circular flow of interaction among the university, industry, and people. Sustainability, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084532
Scallan Walter, E. J., Mousavi, C. T., Elnicki, J., & Davis, S. (2022). Training public health professionals on adaptive challenges: An innovative approach using remote learning modalities. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 28(5), S240–S248. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001522
Seiferth, C., Andersson, E., & Tengo, M. (2025). The role of relational learning in knowledge co-production. People and Nature, 7(10), 2320–2333. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70116
Sirine, H. (2024). Toward sustainable performance: Interaction between experiential learning, strategic alignment, dynamic capabilities and corporate social responsibility implementation. In 15th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies, ACT 2024 (Vol. 2, pp. 2613–2627). Grenze Scientific Society.
Surya, D. E., & Mahmud, W. A. W. (2025). Integrating corporate social responsibility with stakeholder role in small and medium enterprise (SME) projects: The case of PT Chevron Geothermal Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 41(1), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2025-4101-18
Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Quality and Quantity, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2
Upreti, H., & Malhotra, R. K. (2024). Bridging the urban-rural education gap in India through CSR initiatives: A conceptual study with special reference to sustainable development goal 4 (quality education). In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 556). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455601032
Weyant, E. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th edition). Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231
Williamson, D. H. Z. (2022). Using the community engagement-framework to understand and assess EJ-related research efforts. Sustainability, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052809
Worton, S. K., & Furman, E. (2021). Examining peer learning as a strategy for advancing uptake of evidence-based practices: A scoping review. Evidence and Policy, 17(4), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16149619754826
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0


