AI-ENHANCED ENGLISH FOR EMPLOYABILITY: DESIGNING A VISION 2030-ORIENTED EFL CURRICULUM IN SAUDI HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5846

Keywords:

EFL Curriculum, Employability, Vision 2030, Saudi Higher Education, Generative AI, AI Literacy, English for Specific Purposes, Assessment, Learning Analytics, Academic Integrity

Abstract

The vision of developing human capital through improving professional communication, collaboration across cultures, technical document analysis and digital collaboration in the workplace as the enablers of economic diversification and competitiveness is part of the Vision 2030 plan. Therefore, the development of an effective English for Specific Purposes (ESP) program is viewed as one of the ways of achieving those workforce goals, as EFL instruction will improve professional communication in the workplace. However, with the growing number of AI-powered tools used in writing, reading and communicating, this literature review offers an overview of current empirical knowledge gained from studies conducted between 2020 and 2025 about using AI in EFL and curriculum design and proposes a compatible curriculum model for Saudi universities. The current study adheres to the PRISMA guidelines when reporting on its structure and content as a structured narrative literature review [1], and it relies on the findings of studies on AI-powered EFL writing technologies [13–15,18–23]; on the impact of the use of AI on academic integrity [12,16–18,20–23]; on the implications of AI integration into higher education, such as the responsible implementation of AI-powered education [2–7,30]. While "AI-enhanced employability" refers to the ability to generate assignments with the help of AI technologies, our concept involves curriculum designing approaches aimed at fostering AI literacy and skills of verification and reflection. Recent studies on ESP reveal both benefits and challenges related to AI-powered technologies, including the improvement of students' fluency, idea generation, vocabulary acquisition, the risk of AI overuse, and loss of students' voice. In this sense, the choice of a particular approach and model can be significant in achieving the desired learning outcomes. As for the contribution of the study, we offer a combined framework (Fig. 1) and an assessment matrix (Table 1). Moreover, our paper elaborates on a methodological framework of mapping labour market needs into an ESP curriculum, which allows evaluating EFL learning outcomes in the context of Vision 2030. In other words, by ensuring academic integrity and encouraging effective application of AI in the workplace, Saudi universities will have a greater chance to benefit from innovative EFL programs and tools powered by artificial intelligence.

References

[1] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

[2] OECD. OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the Frontiers with AI, Blockchain and Robots. OECD Publishing. 2021.

[3] UNESCO. AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-makers. UNESCO. 2021.

[4] UNESCO. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO. 2023.

[5] World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2023. WEF. 2023.

[6] European Commission. Ethical Guidelines on the use of Artificial Intelligence and Data in Teaching and Learning for Educators. 2022.

[7] OECD. Going Digital Guide to Data Governance Policy Making. OECD Publishing. 2022.

[8] Saudi Vision 2030. Vision 2030 Annual Report 2023. 2024.

[9] Saudi Human Capability Development Program (HCDP). Human Capability Development Program: Annual Report 2023. 2024.

[10] Saudi Ministry of Education. Higher Education and Research Strategy (aligned to Vision 2030). 2020.

[11] Bond M, Buntins K, Bedenlier S, Zawacki-Richter O, Kerres M. Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. ETR&D. 2020;68:1–26.

[12] Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences. 2023;103:102274.

[13] Zhai X. ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2022;3:100085.

[14] Pratama A, Sulistiyo U. A systematic review of artificial intelligence in enhancing English foreign learners' writing skills. PPSDP International Journal of Education. 2024;3(2):170–181.

[15] Lukyanenko R, Wagner G, Paré G. Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews. Journal of Information Technology. 2022;37(2):209–226.

[16] Gasaymeh AM, Beirat MA, Abu Qbeita AAA. University students' insights of generative artificial intelligence writing tools. Education Sciences. 2024;14(10):1062.

[17] Thi XHNT, Thien HVH, Vuong KN, Nguyen TT. Enhancing writing skills through AI-powered tools: perceived benefits and challenges among Vietnamese EFL students. Discover Education. 2025;4:472. doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00905-9.

[18] Black RW, Tomlinson B. University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:8799.

[19] Aljuaid H. The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic writing instruction in higher education: a systematic review. Arab World English Journal (Special Issue on ChatGPT). 2024:26–55.

[20] Alsaweed W, Aljebreen S. Investigating the accuracy of ChatGPT as a writing error correction tool. IJCALLT. 2024;14(1):1–18.

[21] Sakmiankaew I, Nguyen MT, Nguyen NDD, Buripakdi A. EFL tertiary teachers' and students' challenges of using AI tools to improve writing skills during COVID 19. Reflections. 2024;31(3):1120–1143.

[22] Parveen K, Phuc TQB, Alghamdi AA, et al. Unraveling the dynamics of ChatGPT adoption and utilization through structural equation modeling. Scientific Reports. 2024;14:23469.

[23] Budiyono H. Exploring the long-term impact of AI writing tools on independent writing skills: a case study. IJ IET. 2025;15(5):1003–1013.

[24] Moon D. Evaluating corrective feedback generated by an AI-powered online grammar checker. IJIBC. 2021;13(4):22–29.

[25] Razami HH, Ibrahim R. Models and constructs to predict students' digital educational games acceptance: a systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics. 2022;73:101874.

[26] UNCTAD. Digital Economy Report 2021: Cross-border data flows and development. 2021.

[27] World Bank. World Development Report 2021: Data for Better Lives. 2021.

[28] Knoch U, et al. Assessing speaking and writing in higher education: digital and AI-era considerations. Language Testing. 2022;39(4):555–575.

[29] Saudi Ministry of Tourism. Tourism Strategy and workforce development updates. 2021.

[30] NIST. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100 1. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Shafi, A. (2026). AI-ENHANCED ENGLISH FOR EMPLOYABILITY: DESIGNING A VISION 2030-ORIENTED EFL CURRICULUM IN SAUDI HIGHER EDUCATION. Veredas Do Direito, 23(6), e235846. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5846