EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF COMPRESSED WORK SCHEDULES ON ACADEMIC OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

Abstract

The standard weekly workload for faculty and non-academic staff at the University under study is set at forty (40) hours, typically distributed across a five-day workweek. However, varying institutional demands often require extended or flexible schedules. This study evaluates the adaptability and effectiveness of a four-day compressed workweek compared to the traditional five-day schedule in an academic setting. Key performance indicators include university cost efficiency, operating expenses, classroom utilization, and students’ passing rates. Findings reveal that the four-day compressed workweek offers significant advantages. The University achieved over 10% savings in operating expenses, indicating improved cost efficiency. Additionally, both instructors and students experienced more than a 20% reduction in transportation and food-related expenses. A notable improvement in students’ passing rates was also observed, suggesting positive academic outcomes under the compressed schedule. Based on these results over a one-year period, the four-day compressed workweek emerges as a viable alternative to the traditional system. Nevertheless, its successful implementation requires continuous improvement of facilities, strategic class scheduling, and enhanced support mechanisms for personnel to ensure sustainability and maximize long-term benefits.