NATIONAL-SCALE DATA GOVERNANCE DASHBOARDS: REAL-TIME QUALITY, LINEAGE, ACCESS, AND COMPLIANCE FOR SAUDI ARABIA (SDAIA-ALIGNED)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5431

Keywords:

SDAIA, NDMO, PDPL, National Data Index, Digital Government Authority, Metadata, Lineage, Data Quality, Compliance Analytics, Federated Architecture, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

National data programs increasingly depend on governance that is visible, measurable, and actionable at scale. In Saudi Arabia, this need is intensified by Vision 2030, the Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA), the National Data Management Office (NDMO), the Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL), the National Data Index (NDI) Operational Excellence model, and the Digital Government Authority (DGA) policy stack, all of which require stronger evidence that data is accurate, discoverable, traceable, lawfully accessed, and continuously compliant. This review paper revises and tightens the original manuscript into an approximately 5,000-word journal-style paper while preserving its core argument: national data governance dashboards should be treated not as reporting screens but as operating systems for data governance. Using a PRISMA 2020-guided narrative systematic review, the study synthesizes scholarly and official sources published from 2020 to early 2026. The paper contributes four advances. First, it makes Saudi policy alignment explicit by mapping PDPL, NDMO standards, NDI Operational Excellence, and DGA policies to measurable indicators. Second, it converts the prior conceptual framework into a practical federated operating model that includes a governance signal schema, sample OpenAPI structure, and reference data model for assets, ownership, lineage, and evidence. Third, it distinguishes critical from non-critical datasets and leading from lagging indicators, enabling more realistic dashboard design. Fourth, it proposes a 180-day pilot roadmap for 2-3 ministries and identifies implementation risks including metric gaming, uneven organizational maturity, metadata fragmentation, and privacy-aware observability. The review concludes that Saudi Arabia already has the institutional basis to move from policy-centric governance to evidence-based national data governance, especially as artificial intelligence becomes a strategic public-sector priority. The main implementation challenge is no longer writing policies but operationalizing machine-readable controls, shared metadata standards, and interoperable evidence flows across federated entities.

References

Acev, D., Biyani, S., Rieder, F., Aldenhoff, T. T., Blazevic, M., Riehle, D. M., & Wimmer, M. A. (2025). Systematic analysis of data governance frameworks and their relevance to data trusts. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00545-1

Bernardo, B. M. V., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2024). Data governance & quality management—Innovation and breakthroughs across different fields. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100598

Digital Government Authority. (2022). Digital Government Policy. https://dga.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2023-02/Digital%20Government%20Policy_0.pdf

Digital Government Authority. (2023). Digital Government Regulatory Framework. https://dga.gov.sa/en/regulatory_framework

Digital Government Authority. (2024). Digital Government Policies (Version 2.0). https://dga.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2024-03/Digital%20Government%20Policies%20-%20V2.0.pdf

Digital Government Authority. (2025). Digital Government Strategy 2023-2030. https://dga.gov.sa/en/node/593

Eke, D., & Stahl, B. (2024). Ethics in the governance of data and digital technology: An analysis of European data regulations and policies. Digital Society, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00101-6

Gadelha, L., Heyl, F., Mauer, K., Narcı, K., Sezer, Z. H., Behrens, A., Iyappan, A., & Kırlı, K. (2025). Toward a provenance-aware observability framework for human genomics computational workflows. In Proceedings of ProvenanceWeek 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3736229.3736267

Georgescu, M. R., & Schmuck, M. (2025). Data governance as the digital backbone of proactive obsolescence management: A design science case study in asset-intensive industries. Economies, 13(9), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13090272

Ghalavand, H., Shirshahi, S., Rahimi, A., Zarrinabadi, Z., & Amani, F. (2024). Common data quality elements for health information systems: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24, 243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02644-7

Goedegebuure, A., Kumara, I., Driessen, S., van den Heuvel, W.-J., Monsieur, G., Tamburri, D. A., & Di Nucci, D. (2024). Data mesh: A systematic gray literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3687301

Goel, K., Martin, N., & ter Hofstede, A. (2024). Demystifying data governance for process mining: Insights from a Delphi study. Information & Management, 61(5), 103973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.103973

Jehangiri, A. I., Lotzmann, U., & Wimmer, M. A. (2026). Data platforms for multi-organizational settings: A systematic literature review with use cases and a reference architecture. Data Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41019-025-00329-3

Jiang, S. (2025). Big data sharing: A comprehensive survey. Data, 10(11), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/data10110182

Kaginalkar, A., Kumar, S., Gargava, P., Kharkar, N., & Niyogi, D. (2022). SmartAirQ: A big data governance framework for urban air quality management in smart cities. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 785129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.785129

Kanying, T., Thammaboosadee, S., & Chuckpaiwong, R. (2023). Formulating analytical governance frameworks: An integration of data and AI governance approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/3628454.3628461

Koukaras, P. (2025). Data integration and storage strategies in heterogeneous analytical systems: Architectures, methods, and interoperability challenges. Information, 16(11), 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16110932

Kovach, A., Montalvillo, L., Lanza, J., Sotres, P., & Urbieta, A. (2026). Understanding data spaces: A systematic mapping study of foundations, technical building blocks, and sectoral adoption. Computer Science Review, 53, 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100819

Ogrizović, M., Drašković, D., & Bojić, D. (2024). Quality assurance strategies for machine learning applications in big data analytics: An overview. Journal of Big Data, 11, 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-01028-y

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2023). Data management and personal data protection standards. https://sdaia.gov.sa/ndmo/Files/PoliciesEn001.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2023). Personal Data Protection Law (English version). https://sdaia.gov.sa/en/SDAIA/about/Documents/Personal%20Data%20English%20V2-23April2023-%20Reviewed-.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2024). Guidelines for binding common rules for personal data transfer. https://sdaia.gov.sa/Documents/CommonRulesBCRForPersonalDataTransferEN.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2024). Personal data breach incidents procedural guide. https://sdaia.gov.sa/en/SDAIA/about/Documents/PersonalDataBreachIncidents.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2024). Rules for appointing personal data protection officer. https://sdaia.gov.sa/en/SDAIA/about/Documents/RulesforAppointingPersonalDataProtectionOfficer.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2024). Standard contractual clauses for personal data transfer. https://sdaia.gov.sa/Documents/StandardContractualClausesForPersonalDataTransferEN.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2024). State of AI in Saudi Arabia. https://sdaia.gov.sa/en/MediaCenter/KnowledgeCenter/ResearchLibrary/StateofAIinSaudiArabia.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2024). The rules governing the national register of controllers within the Kingdom. https://sdaia.gov.sa/Documents/TheRulesGoverningTheNationalRegisterOfControllersWithinTheKingdomPublicEN.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Adoption Framework. https://sdaia.gov.sa/en/SDAIA/about/Files/AIAdoptionFramework.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2025). FAQs for operational excellence. https://sdaia.gov.sa/en/Research/Documents/FAQsforOperationalExcellence.pdf

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2025). National Data Index operational excellence (Version 2.0). https://sdaia.gov.sa/en/Research/Documents/OperationalExcellencev2.0.pdf

Saudi Vision 2030. (2025). Vision 2030 annual report 2024. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/annual-reports

Tonnarelli, M., Kumara, I., Driessen, S., Tamburri, D. A., van den Heuvel, W.-J., & Oor, P. (2025). Data catalog tools: A systematic multivocal literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 230, 112584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.112584

Volz, F., Münch, C., Lohmüller, M., & Küffner, C. (2025). From data jungle to data governance in digital ecosystems: Empirical evidence from a multiple holistic case study. Journal of Business Research, 196, 115747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115747

Yang, W. (2025). The impact of modern AI in metadata management. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 5, 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-025-00106-5

Zakharchenko, A. (2026). Integrating continuous compliance into DevSecOps pipelines: A data engineering perspective. Software, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/software5010006

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Mazhar, C. B. (2026). NATIONAL-SCALE DATA GOVERNANCE DASHBOARDS: REAL-TIME QUALITY, LINEAGE, ACCESS, AND COMPLIANCE FOR SAUDI ARABIA (SDAIA-ALIGNED). Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e235431. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5431