INEQUALITY, RELIGION, AND PRODUCTIVITY: HETEROGENEOUS PANEL EVIDENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5355Keywords:
Economic Growth, Income Inequality, Religion, Institutions and Growth, Panel DataAbstract
The research focuses on the link between income inequality (Gini) and secularization (non-religion) and labor productivity, using a balanced panel of 119 countries over 1970–2005. Two-way fixed effects, long differences, and income group interactions are estimated with country-clustered errors. Investment is robustly associated with higher productivity across specifications. In pooled panels, coefficients on the Gini and non-religion are small and imprecise. Allowing for heterogeneity reveals sharper patterns – higher inequality is associated with slower productivity growth within upper-middle income economies, while secularization is negatively related to growth in low and high income groups and modestly positive in upper-middle income countries. These patterns are interpreted as consistent with religion functioning as an informal institution where state capacity is limited, and with demographic headwinds in advanced economies.
References
Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118470
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2003). Inequality and growth: What can the data say? Journal of Economic Growth, 8(3), 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026205114860
Banerjee, A. V., & Newman, A. F. (1993). Occupational choice and the process of development. Journal of Political Economy, 101(2), 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1086/261876
Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850119329
Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. (2003). Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 760–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240306800505
Becker, S. O., & Woessmann, L. (2009). Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of Protestant economic history. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 531–596. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531
Becker, S. O., Rubin, J., & Woessmann, L. (2024). Religion and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 62(3), 1094–1142. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20231666
Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7
Bleaney, M., & Nishiyama, A. (2004). Income inequality and growth—Does the relationship vary with the income level? Economics Letters, 84(3), 349–355.
Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Fink, G. (2010). Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(4), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grq038
Bloom, D. E., & Williamson, J. G. (1998). Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. The World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 419–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/12.3.419 (Working paper version: NBER Working Paper No. 6268, 1997.)
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Campante, F. R., & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2015). Does religion affect economic growth and happiness? Evidence from Ramadan. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 615–658. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv002
Cantoni, D. (2015). The economic effects of the Protestant Reformation: Testing the Weber hypothesis in the German lands. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(4), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12117
Chen, D. L. (2010). Club goods and group identity: Evidence from Islamic resurgence during the Indonesian financial crisis. Journal of Political Economy, 118(2), 300–354. https://doi.org/10.1086/652462
De la Croix, D., & Delavallade, C. (2018). Religions, fertility, and growth in Southeast Asia. International Economic Review, 59(2), 907–946.
Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues: Inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57(2), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00099-6
Durlauf, S. N., & Johnson, P. A. (1995). Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950100404
Espoir, D. K., & Ngepah, N. (2021). Income distribution and total factor productivity: A cross-country panel cointegration analysis. International Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 661–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-021-00494-6
Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130954
Forbes, K. J. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.869
Galor, O., & Zeira, J. (1993). Income distribution and macroeconomics. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297811
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2003). People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 225–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00202-7
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607–668. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.3.607
Islam, N. (1995). Growth empirics: A panel data approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127–1170. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946651
Jorgenson, D. W., & Stiroh, K. J. (2000). Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, (261). https://doi.org/10.1787/561481176503
Juuti, T. (2022). The role of financial development in the relationship between income inequality and economic growth: An empirical approach using cross-country panel data. Quality & Quantity, 56, 985–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01163-1
Knowles, S., & Owen, P. D. (1995). Health capital and cross-country variation in income per capita in the Mankiw–Romer–Weil model. Economics Letters, 48(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(94)00577-0
Köbrich León, A. (2013). Religion and economic outcomes: Household savings behavior in the USA. Working Paper Series in Economics, 268. Leuphana University Lüneburg.
Krueger, A. B., & Lindahl, M. (2001). Education for growth: Why and for whom? Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1101–1136. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.4.1101
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1811581
Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2006). What is the demographic dividend? Finance & Development, 43(3), 16–19.
Lozano, F. A. (2017). The rise of secularism and its economic consequences. IZA World of Labor, 2017(384), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.384
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477
McMillan, M. S., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. NBER Working Paper No. 17143. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17143 (Updated analyses in: McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., & Verduzco-Gallo, Í. (2014). World Development, 63, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.012)
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674969797
Ortega, F., & Peri, G. (2014). Openness and income: The roles of trade and migration. Journal of International Economics, 92(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.11.008
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review, 84(3), 600–621. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118070
Piketty, T. (1997). The dynamics of the wealth distribution and the interest rate with credit rationing. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/2971708
Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x
Schnabel, L. (2021). Secularism and fertility worldwide. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211031320
Shah, S. S., Jalil, A., & Shah, S. A. H. (2020). Growth effects of religion dependent social capital: An empirical evidence. Social Indicators Research, 149(2), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02253-2
Shin, I. (2012). Income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2049–2057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.011
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2013). Inequality Matters: Report on the World Social Situation 2013. New York, NY: United Nations. (ST/ESA/345). ISBN 978-92-1-130322-3.
Weber, M. (1905/1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
