MEASURING ONLINE REVIEWS: A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK IN THE EUROPEAN CAMPING SECTOR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5083

Keywords:

Outdoor Hospitality, Online Reputation, Camping, Online Reviews

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital review platforms has fundamentally transformed how service quality is evaluated in tourism and hospitality as well as in camping sector. Despite their growing importance, most empirical studies rely on ratings from a single platform, overlooking the fragmented nature of online reputation across digital environments.  This study aims to develop and empirically test a methodological framework for measuring online reputation through the aggregation of ratings from multiple platforms in the European camping sector. The analysis is based on a sample of 200 high-quality campsites holding the Superplatz designation (ADAC, 2026), for which user ratings were collected from PinCamp, TripAdvisor, and Camping.info. To ensure comparability, platform-specific ratings were harmonized to a common scale and combined using both unweighted and review-count-weighted composite indices. Correlation analysis indicates moderate convergence across platforms, while robustness testing demonstrates high stability of rankings between aggregation methods (Spearman ρ ≈ 0.80). The findings suggest that online reputation should be understood as a distributed construct shaped by multiple digital ecosystems rather than as a platform-specific metric. The proposed framework provides a transparent and replicable approach for more reliable evaluation of service quality in increasingly platform-mediated tourism markets.

References

ADAC. (2026). Campingführer 2026. Graefe und Unzer Verlag.

Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J. J., Jr. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.3.34.18334

Brooker, E., & Joppe, M. (2014). A critical review of camping research and direction for future studies. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2014.02.002

Camping.info. (2026, January 16). Holiday destinations. Retrieved January 27, 2026, from https://www.camping.info/en/topic/holiday-destinations

Cvelić-Bonifačić, J., & Milohnić, I. (2012). Managing quality in camping tourism. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 18(1), 51–64.

de Jonge, T., Kalmijn, W. M., & van der Velden, R. (2014). Homogenizing responses to different survey questions on a common scale: A comparison of alternative approaches. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0335-6

Filieri, R. (2015). What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity–adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. Tourism Management, 51, 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.008

Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784

Leung, D., Law, R., van Hoof, H., & Buhalis, D. (2022). The interplay of review valence and review platform on readers’ perceptions of hotel performance. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 46(5), 897–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211012345

Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011

Mikulić, J., Krešić, D., & Kožić, I. (2015). Critical factors of the camping tourism experience: An importance–performance analysis. Tourism Management, 47, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.012

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Pestana, M. H. (2024). Network structure of online customer reviews and hotel review research: A bibliometric perspective. Information, 15(6), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060334

PinCamp. (2026, February 12). Best campsites. Retrieved February 1, 2026, from https://www.pincamp.com/

Sayfuddin, A. T. M. (2021). The signaling and reputational effects of customer ratings. Tourism Management, 85, 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104231

Sparks, B. A., & Browning, V. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1310–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011

Tripadvisor. (2026, January 27). Valamar Camping Istra – Reviews. Retrieved February 3, 2026, from https://www.tripadvisor.com/

Vermeulen, I. E., & Seegers, D. (2009). Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management, 30(1), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.008

Wu, X., Yang, Z., & Zhu, J. (2024). Ranking hotel products by integrating online ratings from multiple platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 102992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.102992

Xie, K. L., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2014). The business value of online consumer reviews and management response to hotel performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 43, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.07.007

Ye, Q., Law, R., & Gu, B. (2009). The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(1), 180–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.06.011

Zhang, Y., Li, M., & Xu, Z. (2021). Study on hotel selection method based on integrating online ratings and reviews from multi-websites. Information Sciences, 561, 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.050

Zhang, Y., Tan, S., & Zhao, J. (2022). Cross-platform hotel evaluation by aggregating multi-website ratings. Information Sciences, 600, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.102487

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

How to Cite

Cvelić-Bonifačić, J. (2026). MEASURING ONLINE REVIEWS: A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK IN THE EUROPEAN CAMPING SECTOR. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e235083. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5083