RECONSTRUCTION OF PLEA BARGAINING NORMS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF JAVANESE LOCAL WISDOM “NGAKU LEPET” (A CASE STUDY OF CRIMINAL CASE NUMBER 122/Pid.B/2021/PN Pbg)

Authors

  • Mochamad Umaryaji Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Agus Raharjo Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Setya Wahyudi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Budiyono Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5067

Keywords:

Plea Bargaining, Local Wisdom, Ngaku Lepet, Restorative Justice, Criminal Procedure Code, Socio-Cultural Values

Abstract

The regulation of plea bargaining constitutes a novel provision under Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (National KUHAP) and merits scholarly examination. Plea bargaining is intended to realize the principles of a swift, simple, and cost-efficient judicial process. However, its regulatory framework tends to prioritize the interests of the defendant and the efficiency of the criminal justice system, without providing adequate space for victim restoration. This article proposes a reconstruction of plea bargaining norms through the lens of Javanese local wisdom, namely the concept of ngaku lepet (an acknowledgment of wrongdoing accompanied by an apology), as a normative foundation to ensure restorative justice. Through a case study of assault case Number 122/Pid.B/2021/PN Purbalingga, this article demonstrates that practices of confession and victim forgiveness have long occurred in court proceedings, yet lacked legal implications due to limitations within Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure (Old KUHAP). The findings underscore that integrating plea bargaining with the concept of ngaku lepet holds significant potential to strengthen victim protection, reduce judicial burdens, and promote substantive justice that is contextualized within Indonesia’s socio-cultural values.

References

Jatengprov.go.id. (2018). Grebeg Kupat, “Ngaku Lepat” Sekaligus Lestarikan Budaya Jawa. Diakses Kamis, 26 Februari 2026 pada https://jatengprov.go.id/publik/grebeg-kupat-ngaku-lepat-sekaligus-lestarikan-budaya-jawa/

Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (RUU KUHAP) versi 19 Desember 2012.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purbalingga Nomor 122/Pid.B/2021/PN Purbalingga

Radar Banyumas. (2022). Sidang Kasus di Pertandingan Sepakbola, Terdakwa dan Korban Saling Memaafkan di Depan Hakim. Diakses Kamis, 26 Februari 2026 pada https://radarbanyumas.co.id/sidang-kasus-di-pertandingan-sepakbola-terdakwa-dan-korban-saling-memaafkan-di-depan-hakim/

Rahardjo, Satjipto, 1999, Sosiologi Pembangunan Peradilan Bersih dan Berwibawa. Makalah pada Seminar Reformasi Sistem Peradilan, FH Undip Semarang.

Raharjo, Agus, dan Sunaryo. (2010). Pendayagunaan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Untuk Mengawasi Bekerjanya Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Volume 10 Nomor 3, Halaman 197-211.

Ramadhan, Choky Risda. (2015). “Jalur Khusus” dan Plea Bargaining: Serupa tapi Tidak Sama. MaPPI FHUI. Diakses Kamis, 26 Februari 2026 pada https://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/891632jalur-khusus_plea-bargaining_crr_edited_mappi.pdf

Sriyana dan Wiwik Suprapti. (2024). Makna Simbolik dan Kultural Tradisi Lebaran Ketupat bagi Masyarakat Jawa, Sociopolitico: Jurnal Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Volume 6, Nomor 2, Halaman 120-132.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP Lama).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP Nasional).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Umaryaji, M., Raharjo, A., Wahyudi, S., & Budiyono. (2026). RECONSTRUCTION OF PLEA BARGAINING NORMS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF JAVANESE LOCAL WISDOM “NGAKU LEPET” (A CASE STUDY OF CRIMINAL CASE NUMBER 122/Pid.B/2021/PN Pbg). Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e235067. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5067