EVALUATION OF MORTAR UNIT PROTECTION IN A MULTISPECTRAL BATTLEFIELD ENVIRONMENT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.4831

Keywords:

Mortar Units, Camouflage, Observation Systems, Decoy Positions, Modern Warfare, Field Experiment

Abstract

This paper examines the protection of mortar units under contemporary battlefield conditions characterized by persistent multispectral surveillance and shortened counter-battery reaction cycles. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of selected camouflage measures and decoy assets and to assess their impact on reducing the probability of detection and subsequent destruction of firing positions. The research methodology integrates a field experiment focused on object detectability using optical, multisensor, and unmanned aerial observation systems with an analytical framework based on the development of a threat register and a risk matrix. This approach enables systematic evaluation of key asset exposure to diverse threat categories and supports quantification of overall operational vulnerability. The results demonstrate that isolated static camouflage measures exhibit limited effectiveness in a multispectral environment. In contrast, a coordinated combination of terrain exploitation, decoy deployment, and temporally constrained occupation of firing positions significantly reduces detection and engagement risk. The study concludes that effective protection of mortar units in modern conflicts depends not on absolute concealment, but on controlled deception and structured operational risk management. The findings provide a transferable framework applicable to planning and execution of fire support operations under contemporary battlefield conditions.

References

Department of the Army. FM 20-3 Camouflage, Concealment, and Decoys. Washington, DC, 1990

Foltin, P.; Vlkovský, M.; Mazal, J.; Husák, J.; Brunclík, M. Discrete Event Simulation in Future Military Logistics Applications and Aspects. In: Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems. Roma: Springer, 2018, 410–421. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76072-8-30 Vševojsk-1-1 Maskování.

Havlík, T.; Šustr, M.; Ivan, J.; Pekař, O.; Mušinka, M. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Firing Battery in Self-Defense and Protection in the Area of Firing Positions Using Constructive Simulation. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation. 2024. doi:10.1177/15485129241291579

Ivan, J.; Šustr, M.; Blaha, M.; Havlík, T. Evaluation of Possible Approaches to Meteorological Techniques of Artillery Manual Gunnery after the Adoption of Automated Fire Control System. Vojenské rozhledy – Czech Military Review. 2021, 30(3), 75–92. doi:10.3849/2336-2995.30.2021.03.075-092

Lillesand, T.; Kiefer, R.W.; Chipman, J. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Hoboken: Wiley, 2015

Mahafza, B.R. Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2013

Manolakis, D.; Shaw, G. Detection Algorithms for Hyperspectral Imaging Applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 2002, 19(1), 29–43

Mazal, J.; Zezula, J.; Procházka, J.; Procházka, D. Využití modelování a simulace v procesu optimalizace výstavby Ozbrojených sil České republiky. Vojenské rozhledy – Czech Military Review. 2022, 31(4), 140–158. doi:10.3849/2336-2995.31.2022.04.140-158

Ministerstvo obrany České republiky, Praha

Ministerstvo obrany České republiky, Praha, 2005 Vševojsk-3-1 Maskování.

NATO Standardization Office. Allied Joint Publication AJP-2: Allied Joint Doctrine for Intelligence, Counter-Intelligence and Security. Brussels, 2016

NATO Standardization Office. Allied Joint Publication AJP-3.14: Allied Joint Doctrine for Force Protection. Brussels, 2015

NATO Standardization Office. Allied Joint Publication AJP-3.2: Allied Joint Doctrine for Land Operations. Brussels, 2022

NATO Standardization Office. Allied Joint Publication AJP-3.3: Allied Joint Doctrine for Air and Space Operations. Brussels, 2016

NATO Standardization Office. Allied Joint Publication AJP-3: Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations. Brussels, 2022

NATO Standardization Office. Allied Joint Publication AJP-5: Allied Joint Doctrine for the Planning of Operations. Brussels, 2019

Němec, P.; Blaha, M.; Pecina, M.; Neubauer, J.; Stodola, P. Optimization of the Weighted Multi-Facility Location Problem Using MS Excel. Algorithms. 2021, 14(7), 191. doi:10.3390/a14070191

Racek, F.; Baláž, T.; Krejčí, J. Evaluation of Target Acquisition Performance in Photosimulation Test. In: Target and Background Signatures V. Strasbourg: SPIE, 2019. doi:10.1117/12.2532807

Richards, M.A. Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014

Rogalski, A. Infrared Detectors: Status and Trends. Progress in Quantum Electronics. 2003, 27(2–3), 59–210

Rybanský, M.; Kratochvíl, V.; Dohnal, F.; Gerold, R.; Křišťálová, D.; Stodola, P.; Nohel, J. GNSS Signal Quality in Forest Stands for Off-Road Vehicle Navigation. Applied Sciences. 2023, 13(10), 6142. doi:10.3390/app13106142

Šlouf, V.; Blaha, M.; Müllner, V.; Brizgalová, L.; Pekař, O. An Alternative Model for Determining the Rational Amount of Funds Allocated to Defence of the Czech Republic in Conditions of Expected Risk. Obrana a strategie. 2023, 2023(1), 149–172. doi:10.3849/1802-7199.23.2023.01.149-17

Stein, K.U.; Schleijpen, R. (eds.). Target and Background Signatures. Bellingham: SPIE Press, 2013

U.S. Department of Defense. MIL-STD-882E Standard Practice for System Safety. Washington, DC, 2012

U.S. Department of the Army. ATP 3-09 Fire Support and Field Artillery Operations. Washington, DC, 2017

U.S. Department of the Army. ATP 5-19 Risk Management. Washington, DC, 2020

Vollmerhausen, R.H.; Driggers, R.G. Analysis of Sampled Imaging Systems. Bellingham: SPIE Press, 2000

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

Novák, J., Varecha, J., Šotnar, J., Hanková, B., & Zobačová, N. (2026). EVALUATION OF MORTAR UNIT PROTECTION IN A MULTISPECTRAL BATTLEFIELD ENVIRONMENT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e234831. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.4831