BACK TO BASIC: FACULTY PERCEPTIONS, WILLINGNESS, AND CHALLENGES TOWARD A SCHOOL IMMERSION PROGRAM IN A TEACHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.4606

Keywords:

21st Century Education, Challenges, Immersion, Perception, Willingness

Abstract

As educational reforms continue to reshape basic education, faculty members in Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs) must remain responsive to evolving classroom realities. While traditional professional development initiatives provide theoretical updates, opportunities for experiential engagement remain limited. This study examined faculty perceptions, willingness, and perceived challenges regarding the implementation of a school immersion program in a TEI. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed, involving 54 faculty members from a TEI of a state university in Central Luzon, the Philippines. Quantitative data were analyzed using Spearman’s rho, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests due to non-normal distribution, while qualitative data from interviews and focus group discussions were examined through thematic analysis. Findings revealed generally positive perceptions and high willingness to participate in the immersion program. Significant positive correlations were found between perceptions and willingness (ρ = .692, p < .001), suggesting that favorable attitudes strongly predict engagement intention. Although time management and workload were identified as challenges, these did not substantially diminish participation intent. The findings underscore the importance of strengthening positive perceptions and providing structural support to enhance faculty engagement in immersion-based professional development initiatives.

References

About the K to 12 Transition. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://chedk12.wordpress.com/about-kto12/

Ajzen. I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. 50(2). 179-211.

Association of College and Research Libraries. (n.d.). ACRL Immersion Program Committee invites applications for Immersion Program Faculty. Retrieved from https://www.ala.org/acrl/immersion/immersionfacultyapplication

Bandy. J. (2011). Challenges and opportunities of community-engaged teaching. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/challenges-and-opportunities-of-community-engaged-teaching/

Braun. V.. & Clarke. V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2). 77–101.

Buragohain. D.. Deng. C.. Sharma. A.. & Chaudhary. S. (2024). The impact of immersive learning on teacher effectiveness: a systematic study. IEEE Access. 12. 35924-35933.

Cammarata. L.. & Cavanagh. M. (2018). In search of immersion teacher educators’ knowledge base: Exploring their readiness to foster an integrated approach to teaching. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education. 6(2). 189-217.

Clark. R.. Menkhaus. J.. McGinness. A.. & Sutterluety. M. (2023). Exploring the Transformative Effects of Service-Immersion Programs on Faculty. Experiential Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 6(2). 138-151.

Cooper. P. (2016). Teacher education. students with diverse needs and social-emotional education. In Quality and change in teacher education: Western and Chinese perspectives (pp. 293-305). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Creswell. J. W.. & Creswell. J. D. (2020). Research design: Qualitative. quantitative. and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Creswell. J. W.. & Plano Clark. V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

DeVellis. R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.

Dillard. N.. Sisco. S.. & Collins. J. C. (2024). Expanding experiential learning in contemporary adult education: Embracing technology. interdisciplinarity. and cultural responsiveness. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 2024(184). 30-38.

Dolby. N.. & Rahatzad. J. (2018). Experiential learning in teacher education: increasing awareness of diversity through the immersion experience. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education. 2(1). 7-25.

Etikan. I.. Musa. S. A.. & Alkassim. R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 5(1). 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fantinelli. S.. Cortini. M.. Di Fiore. T.. Iervese. S.. & Galanti. T. (2024). Bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application: A qualitative study in the Italian educational context. Education Sciences. 14(2). 198.

Field. A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Flores. M.. et al. (2022). Immersion programs as a tool for faculty professional development. International Journal of Educational Research. 15(4). 112–128.

Francisco. A. R. S. (2020). Teachers’ personal and professional demographic characteristics as predictors of students’ academic performance in English. International Journal of Management. Technology. and Social Sciences (IJMTS). 5(2). 80–91. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3997430

Gutierez. M. G. (2019). The importance of keeping senior faculty engaged in professional development. Journal of Educational Research and Development. 10(3). 251–266.

Kelly. M. (2019). Importance of effective teacher training. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/importance-of-effective-teacher-training-8306

Livaccari. C. (2013). Successful approaches to immersion teaching. Asia Society. Retrieved March 1. 2026. from https://asiasociety.org/education/successful-approaches-immersion-teaching

Mallillin. L. L. B.. & Caday. K. R. (2021). The role of teaching immersion in faculty development. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation. 8(1). 35–49.

Pallant. J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Ronda. R. (2017). Immersion pushed to address work-skills mismatch. The Philippine Star. Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com/other-sections/education-and-home/2017/10/11/1747808/immersion-pushed-address-work-skills-mismatch

Ryan. R. M.. & Deci. E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. social development. and well-being. American psychologist. 55(1). 68.

Sedanza. A. V.. Cerdan. J. C.. & Molina. F. S. (2023). Immersion programs and professional growth: A study of TEI faculty engagement. Journal of Teacher Education and Development. 11(2). 88–104.

Sklencar. A. (2022). Social media marketing and the Gen Z attention span. Retrieved from https://www.onlineoptimism.com/blog/social-media-marketing-and-the-gen-z-attention-span/

Tagare. A. C.. & Villaluz. J. G. (2021). Industry immersion for academic excellence: A faculty development initiative. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 43(3). 321–337.

Violanda. D. L.. et al. (2023). Navigating the professional development challenges faced by senior faculty: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Educational Management. 6(2). 103–120.

Warren. K. (2022). Generation Z (Gen Z): Definition. birth years. and demographics. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/generation-z-gen-z-definition-5218554

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

Castro, R. R. (2026). BACK TO BASIC: FACULTY PERCEPTIONS, WILLINGNESS, AND CHALLENGES TOWARD A SCHOOL IMMERSION PROGRAM IN A TEACHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION. Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e234606. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.4606