SOCIAL COHESION OF SOCIETY: SOCIO-CULTURAL PROJECTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n2.4514Keywords:
Social Сohesion, Society, Social Processes, Social Relations, Social IdentityAbstract
Our study focuses on the issue of sociocultural projections of social cohesion in society. The methodology involved a comprehensive application of theoretical methods, including analysis, synthesis, generalization, analogy, and theoretical modeling, as well as ontological and epistemological perspectives to identify sociocultural projections of social cohesion. Key principles underpinning the architecture of social cohesion during wartime were identified, including sociocultural integrity, homogeneity and heterogeneity, systemicity, the sociocultural orientation of social processes, the influence of natural and artificial sociocultural factors, and the intersubjectivity of sociocultural reality. A model of social cohesion in society has been constructed. The results of the study demonstrate that a sociocultural approach to social cohesion allows it to be defined as a state of dynamic unification of society to address pressing issues. It is shown that social cohesion, as a guiding idea for preserving statehood, unfolds amid profound transformations of the sociocultural foundations of societal life – both social and cultural. It is determined that social cohesion emerges as a result of actions within the sociocultural environment, as interactions and mutual influences among societal actors, both horizontally and vertically, are mediated by the sociocultural environment, while societal actors, in turn, influence the content of the sociocultural environment.
References
Aruqaj, B. (2023). An Integrated Approach to the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Social Cohesion. Social Indicators Research, 168, 227–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03110-z
Battaini-Dragoni, G., Dominionithe, S. (2003). Strategy for social cohesion. Conference on Social Cohesion. Strasbourg, France. http://www.socsc.hku.hk/cosc/Full%20paper/BATTAINI-DRAGONI%20Gabriella%2025.11.pdf
Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Social Cohesion between the Member States of the European Union: Past Developments and Prospects for an Enlarged Union. Sociologický časopis. Czech Sociological Review, 38(6), 721–748. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2002.38.6.03
Bernard, P. (1999) La cohésion sociale: critique dialectique d’un quasi-concept. Lien social et Politiques, 41, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.7202/005057ar
Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
Chatterjee, Sh., Gassier, M., & Myint, N. (2023). Leveraging Social Cohesion for Development Outcomes. Policy Research Working Papers; 10417. ©World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39731
Concerted development of social cohesion indicators. Methodоlogical guide. (2005). Council of Europe, Belgium. https://books.google.co.tz/books?id=Ls6jzwbXGTsC&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false
Dahrendorf, R. (1996). Economic Opportunity, Civil Society and Political Liberty. Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, 27(2), 229–249. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v27y1996i2p229-249.html
Delhey, J., Boehnke, K., Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z.S., Larsen, M., Lorenz, J., Koch, M. (2018). Social Cohesion and Its Correlates: A Comparison of Western and Asian Societies. Comparative Sociology, 17, 426–455. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341468
Dickes, P., & Valentova, M. (2012). Construction, validation and application of the measurement of social cohesion in 47 European countries and regions. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 827–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0116-7
Dovhan, N. O. (2023). Pytannia zghurtovanosti Yevropy: politychnyi dyskurs [The issue of European cohesion: political discourse]. «KELM» Lublin, Polska, 6(58), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.51647/kelm.2023.6.15 [in Ukrainian]
Dovhan, N. O. (2024). Sotsialna zghurtovanist suspilstva: teoriia i praktyka [Social cohesion of society: theory and practice]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii – Problems of political psychology, 30–49. URL: https://politpsy.org/index.php/popp/article/view/150/145 [in Ukrainian]
Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z. S., Lorenz, J., Delhey, J., Boehnke, K., & Unzicker, K. (2016). Social cohesion in the western world. What holds societies together: Insights from the Social Cohesion Radar. Springer. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-7644699-b6192a2fc1.pdf
Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., Brazier, F. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: A new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32, 231–253. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480
Hornostai, P. (2023). Psykholohiia kolektyvnykh travm [Psychology of collective trauma]. Kropyvnytskyi: Imeks-LTD. [in Ukrainian]
Hulse, K., Stone, W. (2007). Social cohesion, social capital and social exclusion. Policy Studies, 28, 109–128. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01442870701309049
Jenson, J. (2010). Social cohesion. In H. K. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 1400–1405). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_614
Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance. Urban Studies, 37(5-6), 995–1017. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980050011208
Kim, J., Sheely, R., Schmidt, C. (2020). Social Capital and Social Cohesion Measurement Toolkit for Community-Driven Development Operations. Washington, DC: Mercy Corps and The World Bank Group. https://ocm.iccrom.org/documents/social-capital-and-social-cohesion-measurement-toolkit-community-driven-development
Mac Fadden, I., Santana, M., Vázquez-Cano, E., López-Meneses, E. (2021). A science mapping analysis of ‘marginality, stigmatization and social cohesion’ in WoS (1963–2019). Qual Quant, 55, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01004-7
Moustakas, L. (2023). Social Cohesion: Definitions, Causes and Consequences. Encyclopedia, 3, 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030075
Norton, A. & de Haan, A. (2013). Social Cohesion: Theoretical Debates and Practical Applications with Respect to Jobs. IDRC Background paper for the world development repor. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313040601
Novy, A., Swiatek, D.C., Moulaert, F. (2012). Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1873–1889. https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v49y2012i9p1873-1889.html
Nowack, D., Schoderer, S. (2020). The Role of Values for Social Cohesion: Theoretical Explication and Empirical Exploration. Institute for Development and Sustainability: Bonn, Germany.
Portes, A., Vickstrom, E. (2011). Diversity, Social Capital, and Cohesion. Annual Review Sociology, 37, 461–479. https://www.ias.edu/sites/default/files/sss/BordersPortes-Diversity-Social-Capital.pdf
Ritzen, J., Easterly, W. & Woolcock, M. (2000). On «good» politicians and «bad» policies: social cohesion, institutions and growth. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23722390
Sharon, J. M. (2000). Social Cohesion Around the World: An International Comparison of Definitions and Issues. Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate, Department of Canadian Heritage. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29131.46884
Schiefer, D., & van der Noll, J. (2017). The essentials of social cohesion: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5
Social Cohesion Concept and Measurement (2023). United nations economic commission for Europe. Social Cohesion: Concept and Measurement. United Nations. Geneva. https://population-europe.eu/research/books-and-reports/social-cohesion-concept-and-measurement
Stepyko, M. T. (2011). Ukrainska identychnist: fenomen i zasady formuvannia [Ukrainian identity: phenomenon and principles of formation]. Kyiv: NISD. [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0





