LEGITIMACY OF LAND EXCHANGE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE CASE OF RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n3.4376Keywords:
Russia, Ukraine, land exchange, international law, United NationsAbstract
This study seeks to examine the legality of land exchange under international law through the study of Russia and Ukraine case. In the wake of Russia's annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014, followed by a war that began in 2022, it has been suggested that the war could be ended by exchanging territories that Russia has seized, particularly in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Therefore, this research seeks to explore the legal framework governing the transfer of sovereignty between states and to examine the extent to which such transfer is legitimate in the perspective of equipped disputes. In addition, it examines whether this exchange violates well-established principles of international law, including territorial honor and the prohibition of acquiring territory by force. The United Nations Charter, the resolutions of the General Assembly, and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice will be examined in this context. We use a comparative approach in this study by looking at historical examples of land exchanges, including those that took place in European regions and between Egypt and Jordan on the one hand, and Israel on the other. In the context of any potential peace accords between Russia and Ukraine, the emphasis is on evaluating the legitimacy of such transfers.The research concludes that the process of land exchange in itself does not establish an abuse of international law as long as it is carried out with the consent of the concerned states and the approval of the constitutional authorities in both countries, particularly if such treaties are registered with the United Nations in accordance with the UN Charter. However, exchanges conducted under military pressure represent an obvious violation of international law and lack international legitimacy.
References
Abd al-Hamid, M. S. (1984). Al-qanūn al-duwalī al-ʿāmm: Dirāsah muqāranah [Public international law: A comparative study]. Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī.
Baral, K. K. (2025). India’s soft power strategy towards Bangladesh: The land boundary agreement and its aftermath. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, 28(2), 166–193.
Becker, M. A. (2025). Legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem (advisory opinion). International Legal Materials, 64(4), 933–1113.
Buchheit, L. C. (1981). Secession: The legitimacy of self-determination. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee (VRÜ), 14(2), 220–220.
Caflisch, L. (2001). Cent ans de règlement pacifique des différends interétatiques. Recueil des Cours, 288, 268.
Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v. Albania), Judgment, 1949 I.C.J. 35.
Corten, O., & Koutroulis, V. (2022). Tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine: A legal assessment. European Parliament, Subcommittee on Human Rights.
Cotula, L. (2017). Land, property and sovereignty in international law. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 25(2), 219–286.
Council of Europe, Commissioner for Human Rights. (2023, April 18). Crimean Tatars’ struggle for human rights. Council of Europe.
Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie’s principles of public international law (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cuyvers, A. (2017). The Maas River border between Belgium and the Netherlands: A successful example of peaceful land swaps. European Journal of International Law, 28(3), 901–908.
ECF – Israel Center for Contemporary Jewish Documentation. (1989, February–March). Agreements between Egypt and Israel concerning the implementation of the Taba arbitration award (1989). https://m00972_israelegypttabaagreement1989.pdf
Fischer, S. (2019, April 17). The Donbas conflict: Opposing interests and narratives, difficult peace process (SWP Research Paper 2019/RP 05). Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Spain v. Canada), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1998.
General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/2625 (XXV)). United Nations. https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/A_RES_2625-Eng.pdf
Global Affairs Canada. (2022, June 14). Canada and the Kingdom of Denmark, together with Greenland, reach historic agreement on long-standing boundary disputes. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2022/06/canada-and-the-kingdom-of-denmark-together-with-greenland-reach-historic-agreement-on-long-standing-boundary-disputes.html
Global Rights Compliance. (2022, May). Donbas & Crimea: Legal un/certainty and global rights compliance – International law and Russia involvement in Crimea and Donbas. Global Rights Compliance.
Greece v. Great Britain (Judgment No. 2), (1924) P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 11.
Hashimy, S. (2023). Exploring the complexities of the Russia-Ukraine conflict: A close look from the lens of international law and global responses. The Indian Journal of Politics, 57(3–4), 91–125.
Hofmann, R. (2020, January). Annexation. In R. Wolfrum (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (MPEPIL). Oxford University Press.
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1971). Legal consequences for States of the continued presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion). I.C.J. Reports. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/53
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1986). Frontier dispute (Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali) (Judgment). I.C.J. Reports. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/69
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (2001). Maritime delimitation and territorial questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Merits). I.C.J. Reports.
International Law Commission (ILC). (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts (A/56/10, ch. IV.E.1). https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf
Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). (2019, November 10). Statement on the end of the Naharayim/Baqoura and Zofar/Al-Ghamr special regime [Arabic post]. https://www.facebook.com/IsraelArabic/posts/2556842787686447/
Israel–Jordan Peace Treaty. (1994, October 26). Annex I (a–c). Avalon Project, Yale Law
School. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/jordan_treaty_annex1.asp
Kyrychenko, K., & Williams, P. R. (2025, February 3). Crimea and Donbas are Ukrainian: A historical and cultural perspective. Public International Law & Policy Group.
Lackenbauer, P. W., & Nielsen, R. L. (2022). Settling the Hans Island/Tartupaluk territorial dispute (Arctic Yearbook – Briefing Note). Arctic Yearbook. https://arcticyearbook.com/arctic-yearbook/2022/2022-briefing-notes/442-close-like-minded-partners-committed-to-democratic-principles-settling-the-hans-island-tartupaluk-territorial-dispute
Langstrom, T. (2003). Transformation in Russia and international law (p. 260). Martinus Nijhoff.
Lapidoth, R. (1989). The Taba arbitration. American Journal of International Law, 83(3), 532–546.
Lattmann, T. (2023). From partner to pariah: The changing position of Russia in terms of international law. In B. Madlovics & B. Magyar (Eds.), Russia’s imperial endeavor and its geopolitical consequences: The Russia–Ukraine war (Vol. 2, pp. 183–198). Central European University Press.
Lauterpacht, H. (1946). The Grotian tradition in international law. British Yearbook of International Law, 23, 1–53.
Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. United Kingdom), Judgment, 30 August 1924, P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 2.
Merezhko, O. (2015). Crimea’s annexation by Russia – Contradictions of the new Russian doctrine of international law. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV), 75(1), 167–194.
Merkx, G. W. (2023). Russia’s war in Ukraine: Two decisive factors. Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 14(2), 13–33.
Metwally, ʿA. H. (1969). Al-qanūn al-duwalī al-ʿāmm [Public international law]. Dār al- Nahḍah al-ʿArabiyyah.
Milano, E. (2006). Unlawful territorial situations in international law. Martinus Nijhoff.
Milano, E. (2014). The non-recognition of Russia’s annexation of Crimea: Three different legal approaches and one unanswered question. Questions of International Law, 1, 35–55.
Ministry of External Affairs. (2015, November 20). Exchange of enclaves between India and Bangladesh [Press release]. Government of India. https://www.mea.gov.in
Murphy, S. D. (2016). International law relating to islands. Recueil des Cours, 386, 13.
Nayar, N. (2020, May 12). India and Bangladesh: Exchanging border enclaves & (re)connecting with new citizens. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu
Obaidullah, M., & Howlader, M. R. (2025). Assessing geopolitical and socio-economic consequences of India–Bangladesh water disputes. Discover Global Society, 3(1), 1–19.
Obligations concerning negotiations relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race and to nuclear disarmament (Marshall Islands v. India), Judgment, 5 October 2016, [2016] I.C.J. Reports 255.
Overheid.nl – Verdragenbank. (n.d.). Treaty between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Belgium for the adjustment of the boundary between the Dutch municipalities Eijsden-Margraten and Maastricht and the Belgian city of Visé (Trb. 2016, 196). https://verdragenbank.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/013320
Ryngaert, C., & Sobrie, S. (2011). Recognition of States: International law or realpolitik? The practice of recognition in the wake of Kosovo, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia. Leiden Journal of International Law, 24(2), 467–490.
Saltzman, A. J. D. (2016). Developing the principle of non-recognition. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 43(1).
Sharma, S. (1997). Territorial acquisition, disputes and international law. Martinus Nijhoff.
Stuyt, A. (1990). Survey of international arbitrations, 1794–1989 (3rd ed.). Martinus Nijhoff.
Tellis, A. J. (2024, May 13). Inevitable fractures: The Ukraine war and the global system.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2024/05/13/inevitable-fractures
Thirlway, H. A. (2018). Territorial disputes and their resolution in the recent jurisprudence of
the International Court of Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law, 31(1), 117–139.
Trone, J. (1996). The Stimson Doctrine of non-recognition of territorial conquest. University of Queensland Law Journal, 19(1), 160–164.
U.S. Department of State, Office of the Geographer. (1964). International boundary study No. 31: The Germany–Netherlands boundary. FSU Law Library. https://library.law.fsu.edu/Digital-Collections/LimitsinSeas/pdf/ibs031.pdf
UN General Assembly. (1960). Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples (A/RES/1514 (XV)). United Nations.
UN General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states (A/RES/2625 (XXV)). United Nations. https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/A_RES_2625-Eng.pdf
UN General Assembly. (1974). Definition of aggression (A/RES/3314 (XXIX)). United
Nations.
UN RIAA. (1988, September 29). Case concerning the location of boundary markers in Taba between Egypt and Israel (Vol. XX, pp. 1–118). https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_xx/1-118.pdf
UN Security Council. (1981). Resolution 497 (1981) on the situation in the Middle East, adopted on 17 December 1981. United Nations.
UN Security Council. (1990). Resolution 662 (1990), adopted on 9 August 1990. United Nations.
United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. United Nations Treaty Series, 1155, 331. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
United Nations. (1979). Treaty of peace between the Arab Republic of Egypt and the State of Israel (UNTS, Vol. 1138, No. 17855 – Annex I). https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201138/volume-1138-I-17855-English.pdf
United Nations. (1988). Case concerning the location of boundary markers in Taba between Egypt and Israel (UN RIAA, Vol. XX, pp. 1–118).
United Nations. (2016). Treaty between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Belgium for the adjustment of the boundary in the Meuse River (UNTS No. I-55014). https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/No%20Volume/55014/Part/I-55014-08000002804f52f5.pdf
Värk, R. (2022, November). Russia’s legal arguments to justify its aggression Against Ukraine [Analysis]. International Centre for Defence and Security. https://icds.ee/en/russias-legal-arguments-to-justify-its-aggression-against-ukraine/
White, N. D. (2015). The relationship between the UN Security Council and General
Assembly in matters of international peace and security. In M. Weller (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the use of force in international law (pp. 293–313). Oxford University Press.
Yitzhak, R. (2025). Jordan—Political survival in the face of regional challenges: Introduction to the special issue. Alternatives, 50(3), 535–542.
Zcelik, A., Gebre-Medhin, D. L., & Siniver, A. (2025). International arbitration of violent
territorial disputes: What role for equity in achieving peaceful settlement? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 16(2), 1–19.
Zohal, D. (2021). Current issues of protection of state sovereignty of Ukraine in the contexto of globalization. Journal of Legal Studies, 28(42), 58–73.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
