INTELLIGENT STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL FOR ADVANCED FOOD PRODUCTION: CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS)

Authors

  • Vesna Knights University St. Kliment Ohridski-Bitola, Faculty of Technology and Technical Sciences
  • Tatjana Kalevska University St. Kliment Ohridski-Bitola, Faculty of Technology and Technical Sciences
  • Vezirka Jankuloska University St. Kliment Ohridski-Bitola, Faculty of Technology and Technical Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4352

Keywords:

Statistical Process Control, Food Technology, Machine Learning, Support Vector Machines, Quality Control, Industry 4,0

Abstract

Objective: This study demonstrates how applied statistical methods combined with artificial intelligence can enhance production control in food technology by improving product quality, reducing variability, and supporting data-driven industrial decision-making. Theoretical Framework: The research is grounded in Statistical Process Control (SPC), Shewhart’s classical quality control principles, and Industry 4.0 concepts integrating machine learning into industrial monitoring. Support Vector Machines (SVM), together with Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) models, are investigated as intelligent extensions of traditional control-chart-based SPC. Method: Classical Statistical Process Control (SPC) techniques based on X̄ and R control charts were integrated with supervised machine learning. Real production data from an industrial filling process producing nominal 80 g “Choco Flips” packages were analyzed. Control limits were analytically derived and implemented in Python. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was trained on 300 samples using multiple kernel functions, with hyperparameter optimization performed via GridSearchCV and model evaluation based on cross-validation and ROC analysis. To assess robustness and comparative performance, additional supervised learning models, including Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were also evaluated. Results and Discussion SPC analysis revealed intermittent special-cause variation in the X̄ chart, while the R chart indicated generally stable short-term variability. For predictive quality monitoring, the SVM with an RBF kernel achieved the highest and most consistent performance (accuracy ≈ 0.98, ROC AUC ≈ 0.92), confirmed through cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization. Random Forest and MLP models demonstrated comparable predictive accuracy, further validating the robustness of the proposed intelligent SPC framework. Research Implications: The integration of machine learning with SPC enables real-time anomaly detection, automated decision support, and reduced reliance on repetitive manual measurements, while maintaining reliable quality assurance. This real-time, intelligence-based SPC framework is particularly suitable for small and medium-sized food production enterprises seeking scalable and efficient quality-control solutions. Originality/Value: The study presents a practical and scalable intelligent SPC framework that integrates classical control charts with machine learning for predictive, real-time quality monitoring in regulated food production environments.

References

Antoska, V., Jovanović, K., Petrović, V. M., Baščarević, N., & Stankovski, M. (2013). Balance analysis of the mobile anthropomimetic robot under disturbances—ZMP approach. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10, 206.

Antoska Knights, V.; Stankovski, M.; Nusev, S.; Temeljkovski, D.; Petrovska, O. (2015). Robots for safety and health at work. Mechanical Engineering – Scientific Journal, 33(3), 275–279.

Berk, J., & Berk, S. (2000). Quality management for the technology sector. Elsevier.

Burgess, C. J. C. (1998). A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2, 121–167.

Chandna, P., & Chandra, A. (2009). Quality tools to reduce crankshaft forging defects: An industrial case study. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 3(1), 27–37.

Chidinma, M. A. (2020). Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the food industry. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 13(1), 171–178.

Collani, E. (1997). A mathematical framework for statistical process control. In H. J. Lenz & P. T. Wilrich (Eds.), Frontiers in statistical quality control (Vol. 5, pp. 69–82). Physica-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59239-3_6

Deming, W. E. (1946). Statistical adjustment of data. Dover Publications.

Escalante, J. E. (1999). Quality and productivity improvement: A study of variation and defects in manufacturing. Quality Engineering, 11(3), 427–442.

Hill, J. W., & Hunter, G. W. (1966). A review of response surface methodology: A literature survey. Technometrics, 8(4), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1966.10490404

Huč, A., Šalej, J., & Trebar, M. (2021). Analysis of machine learning algorithms for anomaly detection on edge devices. Sensors, 21, 4946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144946

Knights, V. A., & Kalevska, T. (2022). Applied statistics as a tool in quality control on advanced production. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Production and Processing (ICAPP) (pp. 18–24). Faculty of Technology, Novi Sad.

Knights, V. A., Petrovska, O., & Kljusurić, J. G. (2025). Symmetry and asymmetry in dynamic modeling and nonlinear control of a mobile robot. Symmetry, 17, 1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17091488

Knights, V. A., Petrovska, O., & Kljusurić, J. G. (2024). Nonlinear dynamics and machine learning for robotic control systems in IoT applications. Future Internet, 16, 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16120435

Knights, V., & Petrovska, O. (2024). Dynamic modeling and simulation of mobile robot under disturbances and obstacles in an environment. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation, 8, 59–67.

Knights, V., Petrovska, O., & Prchkovska, M. (2024). Enhancing Smart Parking Management through Machine Learning and AI Integration in IoT Environments. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1006490

Newbold, P., Carlson, W., & Thorne, B. (2007). Statistics for business and economics (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Official Gazette of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2009). Regulations on the method and procedure for performing metrological supervision and the requirements that packaged products must meet. Official Gazette of the RM, No. 83.

Qiu, P. (2020). Big data? Statistical process control can help! The American Statistician, 74(4), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1637005

Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2(3), 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x

Shi, X., Han, W., Zhao, T., & Tang, J. (2019). Decision support system for variable rate irrigation based on UAV multispectral remote sensing. Sensors, 19, 2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132880

Soni, S., Mohan, R., Bajpai, L., & Katare, S. K. (2013). Reduction of welding defects using Six Sigma techniques. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 2(3), 404–412.

Tran, P. H., Ahmadi, N. A., Nguyen, T. H., Tran, K. D., & Tran, K. P. (2022). Application of machine learning in statistical process control charts: A survey and perspective. In Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics (pp. 7–42). Springer.

Vapnik, V. N. (1982). Estimation of dependences based on empirical data. Nauka.

Zan, T., Liu, Z., Su, Z., Wang, M., Gao, X., & Chen, D. (2020). Statistical process control with intelligence based on the deep learning model. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010308

Zhang, P. (2010). Advanced industrial control technology. Elsevier.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

How to Cite

Knights, V., Kalevska, T., & Jankuloska, V. (2026). INTELLIGENT STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL FOR ADVANCED FOOD PRODUCTION: CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS). Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234352. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4352