THE IMPACT OF GEOPOLITICAL RISKS AND TRADE BALANCE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LISTED COMPANIES IN VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n2.4264Keywords:
Geopolitical Risk, Trade Balance, Firm Performance, Roa, Roe, VietnamAbstract
This study analyzes the impact of geopolitical risk and trade balance on the performance of Vietnamese listed firms over the period 2016–2024, using an unbalanced panel of 588 firms. The study employs a dynamic panel System Generalized Method of Moments (System GMM) estimator to address endogeneity, unobserved firm-specific effects, heteroskedasticity, and serial correlation. The empirical findings indicate that geopolitical risk exerts a positive and statistically significant effect on both return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). This suggests that, in the context of global supply chain realignments and capital reallocation, Vietnamese listed firms have been able to leverage new opportunities created by geopolitical tensions. In contrast, the trade balance shows a negative and significant relationship with firm performance, implying that improvements in the aggregate trade balance are associated with lower efficiency at the firm level. This result reflects the structural dependence of Vietnamese firms on imported raw materials, machinery, and intermediate inputs. Control variables such as firm size, tangible assets, liquidity, Tobin’s Q, and net working capital improve performance, while high financial leverage and the COVID-19 shock reduce it. Moderate inflation contributes positively to firm performance. The study offers new empirical evidence on the role of geopolitical risk and trade balance in shaping corporate performance in an emerging, export-oriented economy and provides policy implications for regulators, investors, and corporate managers.
References
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00027-7
Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885568
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2018). Measuring geopolitical risk (International Finance Discussion Papers). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
Carney, R. W., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Wang, H. (2024). Geopolitical risk and the cost of capital in emerging economies. Emerging Markets Review, 61, 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101149
Cebeci, T. (2014). Exporting and productivity: The role of firm heterogeneity and trade costs. Journal of Development Economics, 106, 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.10.003
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1998). Law, finance, and firm growth. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 2107–2137. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00084
Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw–Hill/Irwin.
Guo, Y. (2024). Geopolitical risk and the internationalization performance of manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00652-7
Haller, S. A. (2012). Importing, exporting, and firm performance. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114(3), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01710.x
Jiang, X., Liu, Z., & Zhang, H. (2024). Geopolitical risk and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China’s A-share listed firms. Finance Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104673
Kaya, H., Demir, E., & Lau, C. K. M. (2025). Geopolitical risk and financial fragility: Global evidence from 40 economies. International Review of Economics & Finance. (Advance online publication)
Kobrin, S. J. (1979). Political risk: A review and reconsideration. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490781
Le, T. L., & Tran, V. T. (2021). Geopolitical risk and corporate investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100753
Lee, C.-C., & Wang, C.-W. (2021). Geopolitical risk and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101837
Lu, Z., Gozgor, G., Huang, M., & Lau, C. K. M. (2020). The impact of geopolitical risks on financial development: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.01.06
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
Munch, J., & Schaur, G. (2015). The effect of export promotion on firm performance: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20120593
Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1995). The intertemporal approach to the current account. In G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1731–1799). Elsevier.
Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1996). Foundations of international macroeconomics. MIT Press.
Pringpong, S., Maneenop, S., & Jaroenjitrkam, A. (2023). Geopolitical risk and firm value: Evidence from emerging markets. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 68, 101951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2023.101951
Tuyet, N. L. H., & Ninh, L. K. (2023). Competition and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. RAUSP Management Journal, 58(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-02-2022-0031
Vu, T. H., Nguyen, V. D., Ho, M. T., & Vuong, Q. H. (2019). Determinants of Vietnamese listed firm performance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12020062
Wacker, K. M. (2024). Investment incomes vs. the trade balance: Is the current account still a meaningful concept? (Working Paper No. 256). Oesterreichische Nationalbank.
World Bank. (2025). Trade (% of GDP) – Vietnam. World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
