INSTITUTIONAL PATHWAYS FOR IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ADAPTIVE IMPORT-SUBSTITUTION POLICY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4216

Keywords:

Sustainable Development, Systemic Transformations, International Supply Chains, Sanctions Pressure, Regional Aspects of Import Substitution, Macro- and Meso-Level Drivers

Abstract

In the context of a dynamically transforming geoeconomic agenda driven by multiple factors—including the growing use of external restrictions as instruments for pursuing political or geoeconomic objectives by a number of states—there is a need to design adaptive mechanisms that facilitate the implementation of sustainable development. One such mechanism is the implementation of an import-substitution policy. Structural shifts in the economy under intensifying external constraints disrupt transnational supply chains for technological and consumer goods. This, in turn, results in serious negative consequences in the social sphere, creating significant risks of disrupting the processes involved in implementing sustainable development. In this situation, developing new—and further evolving established—theoretical approaches to import-substitution policy amid systemic transformations becomes an urgent task. In particular, it is necessary to adapt perspectives and approaches to studying import dependence with regard to the regional component, as well as in the context of ongoing systemic transformations that upend traditional models and theoretical approaches. Taking these aspects into account, the aim of the study is to substantiate and develop adaptive directions for advancing the theory of the economics of forced import substitution as a doctrine for determining courses of implementing sustainable development under conditions of systemic transformation. The subject of the study is the development of adaptive measures and directions for advancing theoretical and practical approaches to shaping a policy of forced import substitution amid institutional and conjunctural transformations, as a key instrument for ensuring sustainable development. The outcome of the study is a set of substantiating arguments that underscore the need to implement sustainable development within the paradigm of developing the theory of the economics of import substitution, oriented toward seeking optimal configurations for designing import-substitution trajectories in the context of their implementation at the macro- and meso-levels.

References

1. Abalkin, L. I. (2000). Selected works (in 4 vols.). Vol. IV: In search of a new strategy. Moscow: Ekonomika, 799 p.

2. Andreeva, E. L., & Ratner, A. V. (2022). Export orientation as an indicator of overcoming Russia’s engineering import dependency. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 5, 46-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2022-5-46-57

3. Aspromourgos, T. (1988). The life of William Petty in relation to his economics. History of Political Economy, 20, 337-356.

4. Belousova, A. V. (2020). State policy of import substitution: Assessment regional effects (on the example of the Far Eastern Federal District). Regional Problems of Transforming the Economy, 11(121), 66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2020-11-66-73

5. Blaug, M. (2008). List Friedrich, in 100 Great economists before Keynes, pp. 166-168. St. Petersburg: Ekonomikus.

6. Bukhvald, E. M., & Ivanov, O. B. (2017). Problems of import substitution in strategies for the development of Russian regions. Etap: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika, 4, 24-41.

7. Burganov, R. T., Gafarov, M. R., & Elshin, L. A. (2022). A factor analysis of digitalization impact on the region's inclusive growth. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 20(5), 904-919. https://doi.org/10.24891/re.20.5.904

8. Bussell, J. (2025). Import substitution industrialization. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved May 2, 2025 from: https://www.britannica.com/money/import-substitution-industrialization

9. Casella, B., Bolwijn, R., Moran, D., & Kanemoto, K. (2019). UNCTAD insights: Improving the analysis of global value chains: The UNCTAD-Eora Database. Transnational Corporations, 26(3), 115-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/3aad0f6a-en

10. Chenery, H., & Carter, N. (1972). Domestic and external aspects of plans and processes of economic development, in: Conference on long-term planning and forecasting, pp. 112-122. Moscow: Institute of Statistics, USSR State Planning Committee.

11. Chenery, H., & Straut, A. (1966). Foreign assistance and economic development. American Economic Review, 56, 679-733.

12. Connolly, R., & Hanson, Ph. (2016). Import substitution and economic sovereignty in Russia. Chatham House, 24 p.

13. Dong, X., Liu, H., & Chen, Z. (2019). Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection. Applied Energy, 239, 1190-1211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.244

14. Fei, J. C. H., & Ranis, G. (1967). Foreign assistance and economic development revisited. Center Discussion Paper, No. 41. New Haven: Yale University, Economic Growth Center.

15. Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3rd ed.). Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 233 p.

16. Krivenko, N. V., & Epaneshnikova, D. S. (2020). Import substitution as a stabilization tool for the socio-economic development of regions. Economy of Regions, 16(3), 765-778. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-7

17. Lavrikova, Yu. G. (Ed.). (2010). Institutional problems of innovative development of territorial systems. Ekaterinburg: IE UrO RAN, 247 p.

18. Linden, G., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (2009). Who captures value in a global innovation network?: The case of Apple’s iPod. Communications of the ACM, 52(3), 140-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1467247.1467280

19. Maitra, P. (1967). Import substitution potential in East Africa. Nairobi; London: Oxford University Press for the East African Institute of Social Research, 51 p.

20. Marakova, N. I., & Dodonova, S. V. (2022). Methodical aspects of the analysis of import dependence and identification of areas for improving the quality of the work of enterprise (on the example of TRIER LLC). Innovations and Investments, 5, 36-42.

21. Myrdal, G. (1956). Development and under-development: A note on the mechanism of national and international economic inequality. Cairo: Bank of Egypt.

22. Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: Duckworth.

23. Ogujiuba, K., Nwogwugwu, U., & Kike, E. (2011). Import substitution industrialization as a learning process: Sub-Saharan African experience as distortion of the “good”. Business and Management Review, 1(6), 8-21.

24. Prebisch, R. (1992). Peripheral capitalism: Is there an alternative? Moscow: ILA, pp. 166-167.

25. Safiullin, M. R., Burganov, R. T., Elshin, L. A., & Mingulov, A. M. (2023). Assessment of economic growth prospects in Russian regions considering import sanctions. Economy of Regions, 19(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-5

26. Toye, J. (2006). Hans Singer’s debts to Schumpeter and Keynes. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(6), 819-833. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bel033

27. Ullrich, K. (2017). Russia – Import substitution during recession. KfW Research Focus on Economics, 173, 1-3.

28. United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. Retrieved September 12, 2022 from: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n15/291/89/pdf/n1529189.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-01-03

How to Cite

Gatin, A., Abdrakhmanova, D., & Elshin, L. (2026). INSTITUTIONAL PATHWAYS FOR IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ADAPTIVE IMPORT-SUBSTITUTION POLICY. Veredas Do Direito, 23(1), e234216. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4216