INTELLIGENT CONTROL SYSTEMS SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING: A TECHNICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVIDENCE BASED ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE

Authors

  • Tran Huu Tuyen Lac Hong University
  • Nguyen Cong Viet Hung Lac Hong University
  • Le Thanh Dat Lac Hong University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n7.4060

Keywords:

Environmental Monitoring, Intelligent Control, Evidence Based Policy, Environmental Governance, Sensor Networks

Abstract

Environmental monitoring is increasingly expected to do more than “observe” ecological conditions: it must also sustain lawful enforcement, support defensible administrative decisions, and enable credible public accountability. Yet many monitoring programs still rely on fragmented sampling routines, manual calibration cycles, and opaque data handling practices that can undermine evidentiary reliability—especially when measurements are challenged by regulated entities, communities, or courts. This paper develops an interdisciplinary framework that connects intelligent control systems with environmental governance needs. We conceptualize monitoring as a socio technical “evidence infrastructure” and show how control oriented functions—state estimation, adaptive sampling, fault detection, and disturbance rejection—can be designed to improve data continuity, uncertainty management, traceability, and responsiveness. Drawing on literature in wireless sensor networks, environmental sensor networks, industrial control, and governance by disclosure, we propose a reference architecture that integrates sensor/edge layers with an auditable data pipeline and governance aligned performance indicators. A simulation based case study for urban air quality monitoring illustrates how adaptive sampling and estimation can reduce missingness, shorten detection delay for exceedance events, and improve robustness to sensor drift while maintaining energy constraints. The discussion translates technical design choices into legal policy implications, including chain of custody practices, transparency and contestability, cybersecurity requirements, and institutional capacity building. The paper contributes a practical roadmap for agencies seeking to modernize monitoring under budgetary pressure without weakening evidentiary standards.

References

Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4

Gomes, M. F., & Sampaio, J. A. L. (2019). Biopiracy and traditional knowledge: Faces of biocolonialism and its regulation. Veredas do Direito, 16(34), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v16i34.1274

Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031

Gray, W. B., & Shimshack, J. P. (2011). The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: A review of the empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req017

Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.1

Hart, J. K., & Martinez, K. (2006). Environmental sensor networks: A revolution in the Earth system science? Earth-Science Reviews, 78(3–4), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.05.001

Isermann, R. (2005). Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis—Status and applications. Annual Reviews in Control, 29(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2004.12.002

Kahl, S. (2023). Obstacles to the use of citizen data in environmental litigation before East African courts. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.493

Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552

Law, Y. W., Chatterjea, S., Jin, J., Hanselmann, T., & Palaniswami, M. (2009). Energy-efficient data acquisition by adaptive sampling for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IWCMC (pp. 1146–1151). https://doi.org/10.1145/1582379.1582631

Likens, G. E. (2010). The role of science in decision making: Does evidence-based science drive environmental policy? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1890/090132

Mason, M. (2008). Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.8

Mendel, J. M., & John, R. I. B. (2002). Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.995115

Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004

Peng, C., Zhang, J., Yan, H., & Yang, Z. (2018). A survey on recent advances in event-triggered communication and control. Information Sciences, 457–458, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.04.055

Qin, S. J., & Badgwell, T. A. (2003). A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Engineering Practice, 11(7), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00186-7

Reyes-García, V., Tofighi-Niaki, A., Austin, B. J., Benyei, P., Danielsen, F., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Sharma, A., Soleymani-Fard, R., & Tengö, M. (2022). Data sovereignty in community-based environmental monitoring: Toward equitable environmental data governance. BioScience, 72(8), 714–717. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac048

Roman, R., Zhou, J., & Lopez, J. (2013). On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed Internet of Things. Computer Networks, 57(10), 2266–2279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.018

Santos, S. (2024). The revisional legislative process in urban policy and its foundations: Democracy and sustainability. Veredas do Direito, 21, e212459. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v21.2459

Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Grieco, L. A., & Coen-Porisini, A. (2015). Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead. Computer Networks, 76, 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008

Shimshack, J. P. (2014). The economics of environmental monitoring and enforcement. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6(1), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151821

Snyder, E. G., Watkins, T. H., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E. D., Williams, R. W., Hagler, G. S. W., Shelow, D., Hindin, D. A., Kilaru, V. J., & Preuss, P. W. (2013). The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(20), 11369–11377. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4022602

Spadotto, A. J., Romero-Barreiro, M. D. P., & Medeiros, G. A. (2017). Inferences on the Brazilian environmental crimes law in comparison with the Colombian criminal code. Veredas do Direito, 14(28), 221–249. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v14i28.957

Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R., Kavuri, S. N., & Yin, K. (2003). A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I—Quantitative model-based methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 27(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00160-6

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Tuyen, T. H., Hung, N. C. V., & Dat, L. T. (2025). INTELLIGENT CONTROL SYSTEMS SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING: A TECHNICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVIDENCE BASED ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE. Veredas Do Direito, 22, e224060. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n7.4060