BETWEEN POLAND AND BELARUS: POLITICS OF STATE HISTORY IN BELARUS ABOUT SEPTEMBER 17TH, 1939, WORLD WAR II, AND BUILDING THE NATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n6.4026Keywords:
Politics of Memory, 17 September 1939, Belarus, Poland, Liberation, OccupationAbstract
It aims to answer questions related to the possibility of a synchronization of memory related to the moment of September 17th, 1939, perceived contradictorily in Belarus and Poland. Furthermore, we would also like to cover some of the objectives of the national identity construction that the Minsk regime has ideologically built during the last three decades. Instrumentalized by political and ideological discourse, it is the institutionalized memory of the state that sustains the long-term survival of the Minsk regime. Belarus has experienced, since the mid-1990s, a return to Soviet interpretations of historical events, being an extreme case of rehabilitation and glorification of the communist legacy. Especially the so-called Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) has become a center point of Belarusian memory and identity. On June 7th, 2021, the President of the Republic of Belarus signed Decree No. 206, establishing the National Unity Day on September 17th. The decree mentions that September 17th, 1939 symbolizes the restoration of historical justice and the reunification of the Belarusian nation, forcibly divided through Poland’s coercion by the Riga Peace Treaty of 1921. On September 17th, 1939, the USSR invaded Poland; previously, Nazi Germany had started its hostilities against the country on September 1st, 1939. The Red Army occupied the Eastern territories of Poland, i.e., Western Ukraine and Western Belarus. Whereas Moscow and the Western Belarus communists labeled this as a “liberation” and a “reunification” of Belarus within the borders of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, for Poland this day signifies an “aggression” and the “annexation” of the Eastern regions of its national territory. The power of attraction of the “Russian world”, instituted by Kremlin, manifests in Belarus not only by promoting soothing common traditional values, which refer to the Russian and Belarusian uniqueness, but also, at the same time, by denying the ties and space of common memory between Belarus and Poland. The idea that the Soviet aggression of September 17th, 1939, a fulfillment of the secret Additional Protocol to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, is a turning point and a founding moment of the Belarusian nation (even though it involved the dissolution of Polish statehood) is a relevant aspect of the political and ideological use of memory by Alyiaksandar Lukashenka’ s regime.
References
***. “Belarus Council of the Republic passes bill to prevent nazism rehabilitation”. Official Website of the Republic of Belarus, 21.04.2021, https://www.nelarus.by/en/government/events/belarus-council-of-the-republic-passes-bill-to-prevent-nazism-rehabilitation_i_0000128722.html.
Anghel, Florin. „Topografia memoriei exilului polon. Babadag, 1939-1940”. Studii şi materiale de istorie contemporană XVII (2018): 191-206.
Anghel, Florin. „Dictatura memoriei. Refugiaţi poloni în România (1939- 1945)”. Revista istorică 5-6 (2010): 409-432.
Baltic News. “Adamkus about the Belarusian suspicion: this is nonsense”. 02.06.2021. https://baltic.news/2021/06/02/adamkus-about-the-belarusian-suspicions-tis-is-nonsense/.
Bekus, Nelly. ‘‘Historical Reckoning in Belarus”. In Transitional Justice and the Former Soviet Union: Reviewing the Past, Looking toward the Future, edited by Cynthia M. Horne and Lavinia Stan, 109-132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Bekus, Nelly. “‘Hybrid’ Linguistic Identity of Post-Soviet Belarus”. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 13, no. 4 (2014): 26-51.
Bekus, Nelly. “Nationalism and socialism: ‘Phase D’ in the Belarusian nation-building”. Nationalities Papers 38, no. 6 (2010): 829-846.
Bekus, Nelly. Struggle Over Identity. The Official and the Alternative ‘Belarusianness’. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2010.
Belarus Segodnya. “Lukashenko about Riga Peace Treaty results: its price is the broken fates of millions of Belarussians”. Minsk, 17.09.2022. https://sb.by/en/lukashenko-about-riga-peace-treaty-results-its-price-is-the-broken-fates-of-millions-of-belarusians.html.
Belarus Segodnya. “Lukashenko: in alliance with East Slavic neighbours, Belarusian lands developed, but they almost perished in the embrance of the West”. Minsk, 17.09.2022. https://www.bb.by/en/lukashenko-in-alliance-with-east-slavic-neighbours-belarusian-lands-developed-but-they-almost-perished.html.
Belarus Segodnya. “Lukashenko spoke about paradoxes of history, liberation of Poland from fascism and current descendants of Nazis”. Minsk, 17.09.2022. https://www.sb.by/en/lukashenko-spoke-about-paradoxes-of-history-liberation-of-poland-from-fascism-and-current-descendant.html.
Belarus Segodnya. “Sergeyenko: draft textbook on history of Belarus’ statehood ready”. Minsk, 11.05.2022. https://www.sb.by/en/sergeyenko-draft-textbook-on-history-of-belarus-statehood-ready-.html.
BelTA. “Belarus, Russia agree on joint investigation of criminal cases regarding genocide”. 23.06.2022. https://eng.belta.by/society/view/belarus-russia-agree-on-joint-investigation-on-criminal-cases-regarding-genocide-151264-2022/.
BelTA. “Belarus marks National Remembrance Day”. 22.06.2022. https://www.eng.belta.by/society/view/belarus-marks-national-remembrance-day-151214-2022/.
BelTA. “Sergeyenko: Belarus’ history has many periods that need additional study”. 11.05.2022. https://eng.belta.by/society/view/sergeyenko-belarus-history-has-many-periods-that-need-additional-study-150099-2022/.
BelTA. “Sergeyenko: Historical memory of Belarusians is subjected to attacks, falsifications”. Minsk, 02.03.2022. https://eng.belta.by/society/view/sergeyenko-historical-memory-of-belarusians-is-subjected-to-attacks-falsifications-148304-2022/.
BelTA. “Belarus MP explains symbolism of Red Army march to liberate Western Belarus in 1939”. 16.09.2020. https://enf.belta.by/society/view/belarus-mp-explains-symbolism-of-red-army-march-to-liberate-Western-belarus-in-1939-133507-2020/.
Bugajska-Więcławska, Joanna. “‘Between Monuments of Winners and Graves in Rural Cemeteries’. Poland-Belarus. Reflections on Historiography”, Studia Białorutestyczne 14 (2020): 71-86.
Chwalba, Andrzej, and Krzysztof Zamorski, editors. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: History, Memory, Legacy. New York: Routlegde, 2021.
Cusitcaia, Daria and Ilaria Zaggia. “Collective Memory and Identity Issues in Post-Soviet Belarus: Soft Belarusisation and the Kastus’ Kalinoŭski Myth”. eSamizdat. Rivista di culture dei paesi slavi/Journal of Slavic Cultures XIV (2021): 153-167.
Дaдaлka, Maрiя. “Прзідзнт прыняў з дакладам генеральнага пракурора Андрзя Шведа”. Звязда, Minsk, 24.01.2022. https://zviazda.by/be/news/20220124/1643016827-prezident-prynyau-z-dakladam-generalnaga-prakurora-andreya-shveda.
Euroradio. “First full-figure Tadeusz Kosciuszko monument unveiled in Belarus”. Minsk, 12.05.2018. https://euroradio.fm/en/tadeusz-kosciuszko-monument-unveiled-birthplace-belarus.
Fedorowicz, Krzysztof. “Europa Środkowa w polityce zagranicznej Białorusi”. Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Lublin 18, no. 4 (2020): 9-34.
G4Media. Lukaşenko: ‘Prăbuşirea Uniunii Sovietice a fost o tragedie. Dacă URSS ar fi existat până în ziua de azi, am fi putut să evităm tot felul de conflicte din lume. M-am născut şi am trăit în acea ţară. Am fost membru al Partidului Comunist”. 19.03.2022. https://www.g4media.ro/lukasenko-prabusirea-uniunii-sovietice-a-fost-o-tragedie-daca-urss-ar-fi-existat-pana-in-ziua-de-azi-am-fi-putut-sa-evitam-tot-felul-de-conflicte-din-lume-m-am-nascut-si-am-trait-in-acea.html.
Gehriger, Urs. “The New Empires in the East”. Die Weltwoche, 24.02.2022. https://www.weltwochw.ch/daily/the-new-empires-in-the-east/.
Gessen, Masha. “The Memory Keeper. The oral histories of Belarus’s new Nobel laureate”. The New Yorker, 29.10.2015. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/26/the-memory-keeper.
Gimpelevich, Zina. Vasil Bikaŭ: His Life and Works. Montreal & Kingston, London, and Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2005.
Głogowska, Helena. Stosunki polsko- białoruskie w XX wieku. Od imperium rosyjskiego do Unii Europejskiej. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, 2012.
Goujon, Alexandra. “Language, Nationalism, and populism in Belarus”. Nationalities Papers. The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 27, no. 4 (1999): 661-677.
Goujon, Alexandra. “Memorial Narratives of WWII Partisans and Genocide in Belarus”. East European Politics and Societies 24 (2010): 6-25.
Gross, Jan T. Revolution from Abroad: The Soviet Conquest of Poland’s Western Ukraine and Western Belorussia. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
Juknevičienė, Rasa and Anna Fotyga. “It’s still the same Russia”. LRT.lt, Vilnius, 09.05.2022. https://lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1690383/it-s-still-the-same-russia-opinion.
Kłysiński, Kamil and Wojciech Konończuk. Opposites Put Together: Belarus’s politics of Memory. Warszawa: Center for Eastern Studies, 2020.
Kłysiński, Kamyl. “The anti-Western narrative in Belarus’s historical policy becomes harsher”. Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich / Center for Eastern Studies, Warszawa, 14.01.2022. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2022-01-14/anti-Western-narrative-belaruss-historical-policy-becomes-harsher.
Korshunov, Stanislav. “Museum Estate of Tadeusz Kosciuszko”. The Minsk Herald, 24.04.2014. https://www.minskherald.com/2014/10/museum-estate-of-tadeusz-kosciuszko/.
Krawatzek, Felix. “Remembering a Contentious Past: Resistance and Collaboration in the Former Soviet Union”. East European Politics and Societies, 36, no. 1 (2022): 298-327.
Laneuski, Aliaksandar. “The Militia and the Special Services in the Contemporary Politics of History of Belarus”. Institute of National Remembrance Review, Warsaw 1 (2019): 219-263.
Lastouski, Aliaksei. “The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions”. In Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past. A Comparative Study on Memory management in the Region, edited by Ninna Mörner, 87-93. Stockholm: Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, Södertörn University, 2020.
Lerhis, Ainārs. “The History of Belarus: Multiply Identities”. In Belarusian Foreign Policy: 360°, edited by Andis Kudors, 11-26. Riga: University of Latvia Press, 2017.
Lewis, Simon. “The ‘Partisan Republic’: Colonial Myths and Memory Wars in Belarus”. In War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, edited by Julie Fedor, Markku Kangaspuro, Jussi Lassila, and Tatiana Zhurzhenko, 371-396. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Lorrain, François-Guillaume. “Biélorussie: l’énigme de bataillon Kalinowski”. Le Point, 31.03.2022. https://lepoint.fr/monde/bielorussie-l-enigme-du-bataillon-kalinowski-31-03-2022-2470353_24.php.
Lutsky, Igor. ‘‘Every period of our history needs to be evaluated from the point of view of national priorities and interests”. BelTA, 14.09.2023. https://eng.belta.by/opinions/view/every-period-of-our-history-needs-to-be-evaluated-from-the-point-of-view-of-national-priorities-and-interests-6505/.
Marczuk, Iwan. “Białoruscy żołnierzᶒ walczący dla Ukrainy schwytani lub zabici w Lisiczansku”. Rzeczpospolita, Warszawa, 06.07.2022. https://rp.pl/konflikty-zbrojne/art36654141-bialoruscy-zolnierze-walczacy-dla-ukrainy-schwytani-lub-zabici-w-lisiczansk.
Marples, David R. ‘Our Glorious Past’. Lukashenko’s Belarus and the Great Patriotic War. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag, 2014.
Perild. “Belarus approves the bill ‘On the genocide of the Belarusian people’”. 14.12.2021. https://www.perild.com/2021/12/14/belarus-approves-the-bill-on-the-genocide-of-the-belarusian-people/.
Posokhin, Ivan. “Soft Belarusization: (Re)building of Identity or ‘Border Reinforcement’”. Colloquia Humanistica. Hierarchies and Boundaries. Structuring the Social in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean 8 (2019): 57-78.
President of the Republic of Belarus. “Aleksandr Lukashenko signs Belarusian genocide recognition bill into law”. 05.01.2022. https://president.gov.by/en/events/aleksandr-lukashenko-podpisal-zakon-o-genocide-belorusskogo-naroda-1641466024.
President of the Republic of Belarus “Patriotic forum Symbol of Unity”, , 17.09.2021. https://president.gov.by/en/events/uchastie-v-forume-patrioticheskich-sil-simvol-edinstva-1632399678.
President of the Republic of Belarus. “On amending the Decree of the President of the Republic of Belarus (amendments to Decree no.157 of 26 March 1998). Decree no. 206 of 7 June 2021”. Minsk, 07.06.2021. https://president.gov.by/en/documents/ukaz-no-206-ot-7-iyunya-2021-g-1623314816.
Rapp, Tobias, and Volker Weidermann. “‘I’m Horrified By What Is Happening in Belarus’. Interview with Belarusian Nobel Laureate Svetlana Aleksievich”. Der Spiegel, 20.11.2020. https://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/svetlana-alexievich-on-the-protests-against-alexander-lukashenko-in-belarus-a-5ef54f55-1816-4933-9afc-b6208645dbc9.
Rudling, Per Anders. “‘Unhappy Is the Person Who Has No Motherland’: National Ideology and History Writing in Lukashenko’s Belarus”. In War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, edited by Julie Fedor, Markku Kangaspuro, Jussi Lassila, and Tatiana Zhurzhenko, 71-105. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Rudnik, Alesia. “Denazification of Ukraine. What can we learn from Belarus?”. Belarus Digest, 04.04.2022. https://belarusdigest.com/story/denazification-of-ukraine-what-can-we-learn-from-belarus/.
Sahm, Astrid. “Political Culture and National Symbols: Their Impact on the Belarusian Nation-Building Process”. Nationalities Papers. The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 27, no. 4 (1999): 649-660.
Savchenko, Andrew. Belarus. A Perpetual Borderland. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Senécal, Patrice. “Aux côtés de l’Ukraine, la dissidence biélorusse prend les armes’’. Le Devoir, Montreal, 05.08.2022. https://ledevoir.com/monde/741912/guerre-en-ukraine-aux-cotes-de-l-ukraine-la-disidence-bielorusse-prend-les-armes.
Smalianchuk, Aliaksandar. “September 1939 as a ‘Site of Memory’ for Belarusians. Soviet Attack on Poland and Its Consequences for Belarus”. Polish History. https:/polishhistory.pl/September-1939-as-a-site-of-memory-for-belarusians/.
Smok, Vadzim. “Belarusian Identity: the Impact of Lukashenko ‘s Rule”. Analytical Pape 3, Ostrogorski Center, Minsk-London (December 2013). https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/belarusianidentity.pdf.
Snyder, Timothy. Tărâmul morţii. Europa între Hitler şi Stalin. Bucureşti: Editura Humanitas, 2012.
Stan, Lavinia. “Truth Commissions in Post-Communism: The Overlooked Solution?”. The Open Political Science Journal 2 (2009): 1-13.
Szczerek, Ziemowit. ‘‘Russia Will Not Collapse”. New Eastern Europe, 12.11.2012. https://www.neweasterneurope.eu/2012/11/12/russia-will-not-collapse/.
TASS. “Minsk know names 400 Nazi SS members still alive who killed Belarusians during WWII”. 28.10.2021. https://tass.com/world/1355317.
Tilles, Daniels. “Belarus declares national holiday marking Soviet invasion of Poland”. Notes from Poland, 07.06.2021. https://notesfrompoland.com/2021/06/07/belarus-declares-national-holiday-marking-soviet-invasion-of-poland/.
Titarenko, Larissa. “Post-Soviet Belarus: The Transformation of National Identity”. International Studies. InterdisciplinaryPolitical and Cultural Journal 13, no. 1 (2011): 7-21.
Velikiy, A.F. “Territorial Status of the Western Belarusian Lands in the Soviet-Polish Relations During The World War II and the Great Patriotic War”. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations 1 (2017): 53-58.
Владимирова, Петя. “Проф. Евелина Келъецева: Имаме нецувана регресия на историята, пропагандирана от режима на Путин”, Дневник (Dnevnik). Sofia, 27.02.2022. https://dnevnik.bg/intervju/2022/02/27/43172238_prof_evelina_kelbecheva_kritichen_pogled_i_prosveteno/.
Wierzbicki, Andrzej. Polish-Belarusian Relations. Between a Common Past and the Future. Warszawa: Nomos, 2018.
Winnicki, Zdisław Julian. Ideologia państwowa Republiki Białoruś- teoria I praktyka projektu. Analiza politologiczna. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnictwa Arboretum, 2013.
Zadora, Anna. “La Grande Guerre Patriotique comme pilier de l’identité nationale: étude biélorusse”. Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest 47, no. 1-2 (2016): 287-314.
Zhurzenko, Tatiana. “Concluding Remarks: Geopolitics of Memory”. In Broken Narratives. Post-Cold War History and Identity in Europe and East Asia, edited by Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, 239-253. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Zhurzenko, Tatiana. “Geopolitics of Memory: Rethinking World War II and the Fight for Hegemony in the Baltic-Black Sea Region”. Crossroads Digest, no. 6 (2011): 116-133.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0





