EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF GREEN ENVIRONMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A BAYESIAN QUANTILE REGRESSION APPROACH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n6.4001

Abstract

Despite environmental concerns, we believe that the benefits outweigh the costs. This study examines the actual impact of the green environment (GE) on economic growth (GDP) and investigates the moderating role of financial development (FD) across 65 countries worldwide over the period 2004 to 2020. Using the Bayesian quantile regression approach, the study evaluates the effect of the green environment across different distributions of economic growth and explores the moderating role of FD. The results show that the green environment has a strong and positive effect on GDP across all quantiles. This finding confirms the important role of the green environment in promoting national economic growth. Notably, FD has a positive relationship with GDP, and when considered in the relationship between GE and GDP, FD amplifies this relationship. These findings highlight the influence of the green environment and the important role of financial development, suggesting that countries should optimize the benefits of GE to promote sustainable economic growth. In addition, policies aimed at improving the financial system are needed to strengthen the impact of GE on GDP.

References

[1] Ali, A., Radulescu, M., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2023). A dynamic relationship between renewable energy consumption, nonrenewable energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from Asian emerging economies. Energy & Environment, 34(8), 3529–3552.

[2] Appiah, M., Onifade, S. T., & Gyamfi, B. A. (2025). Pathways to sustainability in sub-Sahara Africa: Are institutional quality levels subservient in achieving green GDP growth?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 2366–2390.

[3] Apostu, S. A., Gigauri, I., Panait, M., & Martín-Cervantes, P. A. (2023). Is Europe on the way to sustainable development? Compatibility of green environment, economic growth, and circular economy issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1078.

[4] Boudt, K., d’Errico, M., Luu, H. A., & Pietrelli, R. (2022). Interpretability of composite indicators based on principal components. Journal of Probability and Statistics, 2022(1), 4155384. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4155384

[5] Chao, Y. S., & Wu, C. J. (2017). Principal component based weighted indices and a framework to evaluate indices: Results from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 1996 to 2011. PLoS One, 12(9), e0183997.

[6] Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x

[7] Dzwigol, H., Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). The role of environmental regulations, renewable energy, and energy efficiency in finding the path to green economic growth. Energies, 16(7), 3090.

[8] Fernandez, E. J., & Martos, M. J. R. (2020). Review of some statistical methods for constructing composite indicators. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(1).

[9] George, A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

[10] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NBER Working Paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

[11] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443

[12] Jain, N., & Mohapatra, G. (2023). A comparative assessment of composite environmental sustainability index for emerging economies: A multidimensional approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(5), 1314–1331. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2022-0330

[13] Kinuthia, P., Onyango, J., & Adaramola, M. S. (2025). Economic growth, financial development and carbon emissions: Does institutional quality matter?. Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Economics, 2(2), 63–79.

[14] Kumari, V., Sharma, A. S., Devineni, L., Das, S., Bhaskar, R., & Survase, N. G. (2025). Environmental sustainability development, protection and restoration: Challenges for a green environment. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(22s).

[15] Kurniawan, R. D., Riza, H., Wardhani, S. S. W., Ba’Abdullah, F., & Kusumaningrum, D. (2025). Advancing country level research benchmarking: A bibliometric multistage principal component analysis based composite index approach. Journal of Scientometric Research, 14(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20251297

[16] Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

[17] Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7

[18] Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010

[19] Porter, M. E. (1996). America’s green strategy. In Business and the Environment: A Reader (pp. 33–1072).

[20] Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97

[21] Quoc, H. N., Van, H. N., & Le Quoc, D. (2025a). Exploring the determinants of renewable energy consumption: A Bayesian Monte Carlo simulation analysis of technology, economic growth, CO2 emissions, and digital financial inclusion. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(5), 103. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.20133

[22] Quoc, H. N., Le Quoc, D., & Van, H. N. (2025b). Assessing digital financial inclusion and financial crises: The role of financial development in shielding against shocks. Heliyon, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41231

[23] Stöver, J. (2016). Green accounting, institutional quality and investment decisions: Macroeconomic implications from an analysis of the oil and mining sector (HWWI Research Paper No. 171).

[24] Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023). Achieving green environment in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa economies: Do composite risk index, green innovation, and environmental policy stringency matter?. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3468–3489.

[25] Van, H. N., & Le Quoc, D. (2024). Assessing the impact of digital financial inclusion on sustainable development goals: Analyzing differences by financial development levels across countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02515-6

[26] Van, H. N., Quoc, H. N., & Le Quoc, D. (2025). Towards sustainable development: Drivers from financial and institutional development. Journal of Public Affairs, 25(3), e70073. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.70073

[27] Wang, G., Sadiq, M., Bashir, T., Jain, V., Ali, S. A., & Shabbir, M. S. (2022). The dynamic association between different strategies of renewable energy sources and sustainable economic growth under SDGs. Energy Strategy Reviews, 42, 100886.

[28] Zhang, Y., Ong, T., & Kamarudin, F. (2024). Environmental regulation and corporate environmental performance: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(4), 3149. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i4.3149

[29] Zheng, X., & Chen, Y. (2024). A better strategy: Using green GDP to measure economic health. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1459764.

[30] Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2023). Land use planning and green environment services: The contribution of trail paths to sustainable development. Land, 12(5), 1041.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Thuy, B. V., & Hai, N. V. (2025). EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF GREEN ENVIRONMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A BAYESIAN QUANTILE REGRESSION APPROACH. Veredas Do Direito, 22(6), e224001. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n6.4001