NARRATIVES OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND CHANGE: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF MONTHLY REPORTING IN PROBATION REHABILITATION PATHWAYS AND SUPERVISION CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n2.3985Keywords:
Monthly Reporting, Probation Supervision, Rehabilitation Pathways, Compliance, AccountabilityAbstract
This study examines the lived experiences of probationers and probation officers on mandatory monthly reporting as a core supervision mechanism of probation in the Philippines. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of nine probationers and five probation officers in Isabela Province. The inquiry explored how monthly reporting influenced behavioral, psychological, and social dimensions of rehabilitation, and the challenges encountered during its implementation. Thematic analysis revealed that probationers perceive monthly reporting as a constructive process that fosters accountability, self-discipline, and reflective change, thereby supporting rehabilitation pathways. However, both probationers and probation officers identified persistent structural challenges, particularly logistical barriers and resource constraints, which undermine consistent compliance and effective supervision. These interconnected challenges were found to adversely affect monitoring efficiency and the overall rehabilitative potential of probation supervision. The findings underscore the need for adaptive supervision strategies, including more flexible and technology-enabled reporting mechanisms, strengthened collaboration with local social service agencies, and improved alignment between probationers’ rehabilitative needs and available institutional support. By foregrounding experiential narratives, this study contributes qualitative insights to community corrections literature and informs policy-relevant reforms in probation supervision.
References
Ayeo-Eo, S. P., & Jimmy, C. B. (2025). Evaluation of probationers' risk factors and support needs for SUC intervention. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 12(2), 215-219.
Baber, L. (2010). Results-based Framework for Post-conviction Supervision Recidivism Analysis. Federal Probation Journal.
Billore, S., Anisimova, T., & Vrontis, D. (2023). Self-regulation and goal-directed behavior: A systematic literature review, public policy recommendations, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113435.
Buckley, L. (2023). The role of engagement for positive outcomes in probation. HM Inspectorate of Probation.
Burke, A., Carter, D., Fedorek, B., Morey, T., Rutz-Burri, L., & Sanchez, S. (2019). SOU-CCJ230 introduction to the American criminal justice system.
Carlson, I. (2024). Probation: Definition conditions and limitations. ADJJ – Truth. Justice. Equality.
Chan, H. (2021). Assessment on the therapeutic community modality program in parole and probation administration office in Iligan City, Philippines. IMCC Journal of Science, 1, 35-46.
Corrective Services NSW. (2025). Review of the recommendations of the Royal Commission into aboriginal deaths in custody. NSW Government.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Diaz, C. L., Lowder, E. M., Northcutt Bohmert, M., Ying, M., & Hatfield, T. (2024). A
retrospective study of the role of probation revocation in future criminal justice involvement. Journal of Criminal Justice, 93, 102225.
Dioces, G. M., Mariano, J. L., Daniels, J. C., & Dellosa, R. M. (2019). The life experiences of probationers under therapeutic community in Quirino Province, Philippines. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 2783-2789.
Fenellere, P. D., Pensotes, J. R., Piczon, R. C., Sabijon, A. D., & Reposo, M. J. (2025). Guiding lives for the better: Work narrative of the parole and probation officers. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(8), 2204-2217.
Gordon, S. (2025, May 13). Modern technology is transforming probation supervision. Catalis.
Harding, D. J., Western, B., & Sandelson, J. A. (2022). From supervision to opportunity: Reimagining probation and parole. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 701(1), 8-25.
Horowitz, J. (2020). Policy reforms can strengthen community supervision. The Pew CharitableTrusts.
Kittayarak, K. (2010). Community-based alternatives to incarceration in Thailand: Current trends and future prospects. UNAFEI.
Ivery, E. (2020). The Influence of community-based reentry programs on reintegrating ex-offenders in Ohio. Walden University.
Kuadli, J. (2022). What is probation? A guide to the criminal justice system. Legal Jobs.
Li, D., Chu, C. M., Xu, X., Zeng, G., & Ruby, K. (2018). Risk and protective factors for probation success among youth offenders in Singapore. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(2), 194-213.
Lopoo, E., Schiraldi, V., & Ittner, T. (2023). How little supervision can we have? Annual Review of Criminology, 6(1), 23-42.
Ludwig, V. U., Brown, K. W., & Brewer, J. A. (2020). Self-regulation without force: Can awareness leverage reward to drive behavior change? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1382-1399.
Manila Bulletin (2022). DOJ’s parole, probation office to enhance rehabilitation of criminal offenders in 2023.
Mariano, J. L. (2019). The impact of therapeutic community in the perception of a probationer in Quirino Province, Philippines. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 2778-2782.
Moore, R., & Kenton, O. (2021). Building the evidence base for high-quality probation services: The role of probation providers. HM Inspectorate of Probation.
Paudac, C. G., Gementiza, V. S., Apao, H. V., Gubot, A. C., Bondaco, S. L., Culanag, T. Y., & Cuevas, J. F. (2024). Lived experiences of probationers towards community-based correction program: A qualitative study. Mediterranean Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 08(02), 218-229.
Philippine Information Agency. (2024, August 28). PPA, PAO assist clients thru rehab programs, free legal services.
Ponton, D. (2025). Probation officers' perceptions of probationers economic barriers to successfully complete probation in Eastern North Carolina. Walden University.
PPA. (2022). Parole and probation administration omnibus rules on probation methods and procedures.
Presado, J. E., & Ballado, R. S. (2019). Parole and probation administration in Northern Samar, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies , 6(3), 88-101.
Respicio & Co. (2024). Requirements for probation in the Philippines. https://www.respicio.ph/commentaries/requirements-for-probation-in-the-philippines
Rizer, A. L., Bala, N., & Mooney, E. (2020). Realigning probation with our values. National Affairs.
Robertson, K. (2021). Juvenile probation officers’ perspectives on the success factors of youth diversion programs. Walden University.
Roth, A., & Kajeepeta, S. (2021). How probation supervision contributes to jail populations. Safety and Justice Challenge.
Schaefer, L., Townsley, M., & Hutchins, B. (2022). Can family and friends improve probation and parole outcomes? A quantitative evaluation of Triple-S: Social Supports in Supervision (38/18-19). Criminology Research Grant.
Schippers, G. M., Märker, N., & De Fuentes-Merillas, L. (2001). Social skills training, prosocial behavior, and aggressiveness in adult incarcerated offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(2), 244-251.
Schuman-Olivier, Z., Trombka, M., Lovas, D. A., Brewer, J. A., Vago, D. R., Gawande, R., Dunne, J. P., Lazar, S. W., Loucks, E. B., & Fulwiler, C. (2020). Mindfulness and behavior change. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 28(6), 371-394.
Settle, L. (2022). Rehabilitating homes and humans: Probation, gender and domesticity in Britain, 1907–1960. Women's History Review, 32(4), 560-577.
Stephenson, M. L. (2020). Probation and parole officers’ experiences addressing probation and parole officers’ experiences addressing criminogenic needs of adult felony offenders. Walden University.
Thailand Institute of Justice. (2015). The seminar on promoting community-based treatment in the ASEAN Region. TIJ Thailand.
Turner, H. C., Scheyett, A. M., & Allen, L. D. (2022). Legal and extralegal factors associated with success on misdemeanor probation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(03), 257-272.
Walters, S. (2020). Research designs in psychology. In Psychology - 1st Canadian Edition. Pressbooks.
Webster, R. (2023). Good probation supervision does reduce reoffending.
Wodahl, E. J., & Garland, B. (2018). Community supervision officers. Routledge Handbook of Corrections in the United States, 179-192.
Wodahl, E. J., Mowen, T. J., & Garland, B. E. (2020). The effect of individual characteristics and supervision experiences on the perceived quality of the supervision relationship. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(5), 523-545.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yukhnenko, D., et al. (2020). A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update. PubMed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
