A COMPREHENSIVE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ECOSYSTEM FOR THAI HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: ALIGNING WITH SDG 4 (QUALITY EDUCATION)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n6.3951Keywords:
Academic Integrity, SDG 4 (Quality Education), Higher Education, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Assessment Design, Governance, Thailand, Academic Literacy, AI EthicsAbstract
Objectives: This study examines the systemic challenges of academic integrity in Thai higher education amid the rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (AI), and proposes an ecosystem-based model aligned with SDG 4 (Quality Education) to strengthen integrity, governance, and assessment. Theoretical Framework: The research draws on systems thinking, academic integrity theory, and AI governance principles, integrating cultural responsiveness relevant to Southeast Asian contexts. Method: A multi-site qualitative design was employed across 12 universities in Thailand, involving 283 participants including administrators, faculty, support staff, student leaders, and international experts. Data were collected through focus groups, semi-structured interviews, and policy document analyses, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results and Discussion: Findings reveal six systemic integrity challenges: fragmented policies, assessment vulnerabilities heightened by AI, academic literacy gaps, faculty workload constraints, cultural norms affecting enforcement, and uneven digital infrastructure. These challenges collectively weaken institutional coherence and create opportunities for AI-enabled misconduct. Research Implications: The study proposes an Academic Integrity Ecosystem Model encompassing governance, assessment reform, literacy development, faculty capacity building, student engagement, digital infrastructure, and AI ethics—supporting the operationalization of SDG 4 within higher education policy and practice. Originality/Value: This is the first multi-university qualitative study in Thailand to integrate AI governance, cultural dynamics, and systems thinking into a comprehensive integrity framework. It offers a practical roadmap for ASEAN institutions strengthening academic integrity in the AI era.
References
Adebayo, O. (2023). Academic integrity and assessment security in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09452-1
Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Dawson, P., & Boud, D. (2020). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 79(1), 55–70.
Akerlind, G., McAlpine, L., & Jazvac‐Martek, M. (2018). Supervising doctoral students: Variation in purpose and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 1–11.
Alvarez, I. (2024). AI governance in higher education: Emerging ethical and policy challenges. Computers & Education, 205, 104616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104616
Amigud, A., & Dawson, P. (2020). The law and prevention of contract cheating in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(1), 1–16.
Anderson, M., & Rainie, L. (2023). The future of AI in education. Pew Research Center.
Ashton, S., & Davies, R. (2021). Academic writing development for international students: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 15(2), 12–30.
Bailey, J. (2020). The impact of assessment design on cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1031–1046.
Berman, J., & Smyth, R. (2023). Higher education in the AI era: Opportunities and threats. Studies in Higher Education, 48(2), 289–304.
Bretag, T. (2016). Challenges in addressing plagiarism in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 461–464.
Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., East, J., McGowan, U., … James, C. (2011). Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2), 3–12.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Brown, N., & Leigh, J. (2020). Rapid digitalization and ethical risks in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1431–1447.
Carroll, J., & Zetterling, C. M. (2022). Teaching academic integrity in diverse cultural contexts. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18, 6.
Chen, Y., & Lin, S. (2023). AI-enhanced assessment: Promise and risks. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(2), 145–162.
Choi, E., & Jang, S. (2020). Cultural factors influencing plagiarism in East Asian students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(1), 67–85.
Cochrane, T. (2023). AI pedagogy and assessment design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 1–23.
Dawson, P. (2021). Cheating and cybercrime in higher education. Routledge.
Dawson, P., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2019). Can software identify contract cheating? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 639–650.
Eaton, S. E. (2021). Contract cheating in global higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 43(4), 436–451.
Eaton, S. E. (2023). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: Emerging frameworks. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, 2.
European Network for Academic Integrity. (2021). Academic Integrity Best Practice Guidelines.
Fixsen, D., Blase, K., Naoom, S., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: Synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida.
Frick, T., & Dagli, C. (2022). Authentic assessment: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, 100433.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gamage, D., Silva, K., & Gunawardhana, L. (2020). Online assessment during COVID-19: Challenges and student perceptions. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(3), 123–142.
Gupta, S., & Ferns, S. (2021). Work-integrated learning and assessment authenticity. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 515–531.
Harper, R., & Bretag, T. (2020). Detecting contract cheating: New insights. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 110–119.
Hayes, N., & Introna, L. (2023). AI, ethics, and epistemic responsibility in higher education. Ethics and Information Technology, 25, 12–24.
Heath, D., & Eaton, S. (2022). Moderation practices in higher education: A scoping review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1135–1154.
ICAI. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity.
Introna, L. (2021). Ethics of machine judgment in academia. AI & Society, 36(3), 931–943.
International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). Best practices in academic integrity.
Jiang, H., & Huang, X. (2023). Student perceptions of AI in academic writing. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100164.
Johnson, T., & Gibson, K. (2022). Integrity education: What works? Educational Integrity Journal, 18, 5.
Jones, A. (2019). Academic literacy and student success. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 219–232.
Kechagias, K. (2023). AI literacy in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 561–578.
Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
Leung, M., & Huang, J. (2023). AI-supported cheating: A new frontier. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 55–70.
Lin, F. (2022). Student engagement and peer support in academic integrity. Higher Education Pedagogies, 7(1), 13–29.
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358.
Mahmud, S., & McGowan, S. (2022). Preventing plagiarism through education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18, 9.
McCabe, D., Butterfield, K., & Trevino, L. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Morris, E. J. (2022). Digital exams and academic integrity. Assessment in Higher Education, 47(5), 666–679.
Newton, P. (2018). Contract cheating: Prevalence and implications. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–16.
OECD. (2019). OECD principles on AI.
Park, C. (2020). Collusion vs. collaboration: Boundaries and challenges. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2331–2345.
QAA. (2020). Building a culture of academic integrity: UK guidance.
Reiley, J., Richards, E., & Smith, J. (2022). Writing center effectiveness: A meta-review. Journal of Academic Writing, 12(1), 20–45.
Saffold, R., & Brown, C. (2021). Faculty training for academic integrity. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 44(3), 411–426.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. Doubleday.
Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2020). The role of authentic assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1837–1853.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2020). Academic misconduct in the digital era. Educational Integrity Journal, 16, 7.
TEQSA. (2017). Good practice note: Academic integrity.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence.
Wang, Y., & Li, Q. (2023). Generative AI and student misconduct. Computers & Education, 204, 104913.
Williams, K., & Lee, A. (2020). Doctoral supervision and integrity. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(5), 935–950.
Zhang, H. (2022). AI and the future of higher education assessment. Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 455–472.*
Zheng, X., & Cheng, L. (2021). Academic writing challenges of EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 51, 100789.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
