THE LEGITIMACY TRILEMMA: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION, CRISIS OF TRUST, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SOCIAL LICENSE TO OPERATE IN LARGE-SCALE MINING IN LATIN AMERICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.3939Keywords:
Social License to Operate, Strategic Communication, Large-Scale Mining, Crisis of Legitimacy, Community Trust, ESG, Stakeholder TheoryAbstract
This study addresses the crucial role of strategic institutional communication in obtaining and, fundamentally, in the long-term maintenance of the Social License to Operate (SLO) within the large-scale mining industry in Latin America. The SLO, defined as the continuous and evolving consent of stakeholders, is an imperative that transcends regulatory compliance. The study employs a qualitative, comparative multiple-case study design, analyzing the communication strategy of a project in the initial phase of trust building (Los Azules, Argentina) and contrasting it with the collapse of legitimacy in a mature operation that culminated in a social and legal crisis (Cobre Panamá, Panamá). The evidence is complemented by benchmarking of practices from sector leaders (BHP, Rio Tinto). The results demonstrate that, while proactive transparency generates initial trust capital, this capital is volatile. SLO maintenance is lost due to a Rhetoric-Reality Gap, where the communication of positive Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) indicators is misaligned with the local perception of real impact, transforming the discourse into a monological strategy perceived as insincere. The concept of the Legitimacy Trilemma is introduced to frame the tension between legal, economic, and sociopolitical legitimacies. The study concludes that communication must migrate from intent to verifiable outcome to ensure sustainable legitimacy, providing theoretical implications for Stakeholder Theory and practical implications for risk management in volatile Latin American contexts.
References
Aaronson, S. A. (2011). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588
Abidin, Z., Jalal, J., & Sodiq, A. (2025). The five tiers of corporate social responsibility (CSR): From risk management to social business. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(5), 940–961. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2023-0146
Abuya, W. (2023). Does Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Actually Develop Mining Communities? An Examination of CSR Programmes in Kenya’s Mining Sector BT - Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries: Challenges in the Extractive Industry (S. K. Msosa, S. Mugova, & C. Mlambo, Eds; pp. 83–109). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27512-8_6
Ackers, B., & Grobbelaar, S. E. (2022). The impact of the integrated reporting framework on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures – the case of South African mining companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(6), 1106–1127. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2020-0508
Adnan, T., Praptiningsih, N., Program, N. K., Pertolongan, S., Pesawat, K., & Penerbangan, P. (2024). Impact Of Research And Community Service Programs Of Higher Education Institutions On Local Economic Empowerment In Indonesia: A Literature Review Study. Injotel.Org, 2(1). http://injotel.org/index.php/12/article/view/60
Alves, W., Ferreira, P., & Araújo, M. (2021). Challenges and pathways for Brazilian mining sustainability. Resources Policy, 74, 101648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101648
Amoah, P., & Eweje, G. (2024). Examining the social sustainability strategies of multinational mining companies in a developing country. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(3), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2022-0480
Amos, G., Management, S. B.-E. J. of B. and, & 2024, undefined. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Industry: Exploring Perspectives of Host Communities in a Developing Country. Ejbmr.Org, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.2.2164
Areta Hiziroglu, O., & Dogan, O. (2025). A Framework for Sustainability Performance Measurement Through Process Mining: Integration of GRI Metrics in Operational Processes. Systems, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070547
Arias Valle, M., & Marimon, F. (2025). Evaluating Sustainability Research in Argentine Higher Education. Higher Learning Research Communications, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v15i2.1614
Arias-Valle, M. B., & Marimon, F. (2024). Do Argentine Universities Incorporate Sustainability in Their Extension Activities? Luna Azul, 59, 172–194. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2024.59.9
Arias-Valle, M. B., & Marimon, F. (2025). The engagement with sustainability: The case of the Argentine university system. Educación y Humanismo, 27(49), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.27.49.7385
Arias-Valle, M.-B., & Coria Augusto, C. J. (2024). Sustainability in Action: Building a responsible future. RevIISE - Revista De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanas, 24(24), 53–54. https://ojs.unsj.edu.ar/index.php/reviise/article/view/1215/1387
Arias-Valle, M.-B., Lillo-Murcia, A. M., Perez-Armendáriz, M. P., & Navarro, M. (2022). The inclusion of sustainability in mining companies. Journal Managment & Business Studies, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32457/jmabs.v4i2.1932
Arias-Valle, M.-B., & Marimon, F. (2024). Do Argentine Higher Education Institutions promote sustainability? Revista Andina de Educación, 8(1), 000812–000812. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2024.8.1.2
Arias-Valle, M.-B., & Marimon, F. (2025). Evolution of Latin American Higher Education Institutions’ Commitment to the 2030 Agenda. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 27(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2025-0007
Bamber, P., Fernandez-Stark, K., & Molina, O. (2024). Innovation and competitiveness in the copper-mining GVC: developing local suppliers in Peru. Industrial and Corporate Change, 33(4), 940–964. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtad033
Bansah, K. J., Acquah, P. J., & Boafo, A. (2024). Land, water, and forest degradation in artisanal and small-scale mining: Implications for environmental sustainability and community wellbeing. Resources Policy, 90, 104795–104795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104795
Berberoglu, Y., Mangla, S. K., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2024). Towards sustainable mining in an emerging economy: Assessment of sustainability challenges. Resources Policy, 97, 105288–105288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105288
Bice, S. (2014). What Gives You a Social Licence? An Exploration of the Social Licence to Operate in the Australian Mining Industry. Resources, 3(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3010062
Bice, S., & Moffat, K. (2014). Social licence to operate and impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.950122
Boutilier, R., & Thomson, I. (2023). Social License to Operate (pp. 1665–1669). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_127
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, L., Qalati, S. A., & Fan, M. (2024). Effects of sustainable innovation on stakeholder engagement and societal impacts: The mediating role of stakeholder engagement and the moderating role of anticipatory governance. Sustainable Development, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3247
Coria Augusto, C. J., Arias-Valle, M.-B., Marimon, F., Olivares Chicahuala, C., & Cañizares, M.-B. (2025). Commitment to sustainability in supplier companies in the mining sector: Analysis of corporate missions in San Juan, Argentina. Baltica, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.5200/baltica.2025.1.7
Dmuchowski, P., Dmuchowski, W., Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A. H., & Gworek, B. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) model; impacts and sustainable investment – Global trends and Poland’s perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117023
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
Esteves, A. M. (2008). Mining and social development: Refocusing community investment using multi-criteria decision analysis. Resources Policy, 33(1), 39–47.
Fikru, M. G., Brodmann, J., Eng, L. L., & Grant, J. A. (2024). ESG ratings in the mining industry: Factors and implications. The Extractive Industries and Society, 20, 101521–101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101521
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (p. 276). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Gairola, S. U., Khanduri, A. K., & Bhuvaneswari, V. (2025). Sustainable mining: Reducing waste and enhancing resource efficiency. Discover Civil Engineering, 2(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-025-00233-9
Gamez, D., Arias Valle, M. B., Perez Armendariz, & Suarez, Natalia. (2025). Formando Agentes de Cambio: La Educación en Responsabilidad Social Corporativa como Pilar de la Sostenibilidad Empresarial. Revista Del Instituto de Desarrollo Sostenible, 4(4), 39–50.
Gunningham, N., & Sincalir, D. (2019). Regulatory Pluralism: Designing Policy Mixes for Environmental Protection * (pp. 463–490). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315194288-9
Ivic, A., Saviolidis, N. M., & Johannsdottir, L. (2021). Drivers of sustainability practices and contributions to sustainable development evident in sustainability reports of European mining companies. Discover Sustainability, 2(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00025-y
Jovanović, V., Stanković, S., & Krstić, V. (2023). Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability in Mining Companies as a Result of the Interaction between Knowledge Management and Green Innovation—The SEM Approach. Sustainability, 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612122
Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X
Lèbre, É., Stringer, M., Svobodova, K., Owen, J. R., Kemp, D., Côte, C., Arratia-Solar, A., & Valenta, R. K. (2020). The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18661-9
Matikainen, L. S. (2022). Addressing Sustainability in the Mining Industry Through Stakeholder Engagement. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779221078673
Moeremans, B., & Dooms, M. (2025). Social license to operate: Factors determining social acceptance among local port community stakeholders. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 27(1), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-024-00297-x
Moffat, K., Lacey, J., Zhang, A., & Leipold, S. (2016). The social licence to operate: A critical review. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 89(5), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv044
Murphy, M., & Bertignoll, H. (2025). Shaping the future of mining; balancing responsible extraction of resources and related social impacts through the PRO SLO education initiative. 6th International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing, 253, 1584–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.220
Northey, S., Haque, N., & Mudd, G. (2013). Using sustainability reporting to assess the environmental footprint of copper mining. Special Volume: Sustainable Consumption and Production for Asia: Sustainability through Green Design and Practice, 40, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.027
Ocampo, A. (2024). ‘La Comunicación y el Liderazgo para la Sostenibilidad’ ‘Communication and Leadership for Sustainability’. 4, 53–75.
Ocampo, A. (2025). Sustainable Leadership in Mining: Towards a Green and Responsible Future. Prisma ODS Revista Multidisciplinaria Sobre Desarrollo Sostenible, 5, 1–12.
Ofosu, G., & Arthur-Holmes, F. (2025). Transforming Ghana’s ASM industry: The intersection of ‘mining schemes’ and stakeholder collaboration. Resources Policy, 105, 105610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105610
Olivares Chicahuala, C., & Arias-Valle, M. B. (2024). Hacia una Minería Sostenible en San Juan: Desafíos, Prácticas y Oportunidades. Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, 3, 98–109.
Parsons, R., Lacey, J., & Moffat, K. (2014). Maintaining legitimacy of a contested practice: How the minerals industry understands its ‘social licence to operate’. Resources Policy, 41, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.04.002
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2 (January-February)), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039410055963
Rathobei, K. E., Ranängen, H., & Lindman, Å. (2024). Exploring broad value creation in mining—Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder management in practice. The Extractive Industries and Society, 17, 101412–101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101412
Rodrigues, M., Alves, M.-C., Silva, R., & Oliveira, C. (2022). Mapping the Literature on Social Responsibility and Stakeholders’ Pressures in the Mining Industry. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100425
Ruiz-Blanco, S., Romero, S., & Fernandez-Feijoo, B. (2022). Green, blue or black, but washing–What company characteristics determine greenwashing? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(3), 4024–4045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01602-x
Saenz, C. (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and the social licence to operate: A case study in Peru. Resources Policy, 74, 102399–102399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102399
Saenz, C. (2023). Creating shared value strategies to reach the United Nations sustainable development goals: Evidence from the mining industry. The Extractive Industries and Society, 14, 101255–101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101255
Saenz, C. (2024). Stakeholders, social and environmental impact management as key factors of the corporate social management in the mining industry: A Peruvian case study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2595
Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social license to operate. SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 1, 1779–1796.
Vanclay, F. (2003). International Principles For Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491
Vanclay, F. (2017). Principles to gain a social licence to operate for green initiatives and biodiversity projects. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 29, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.003
Vošnjak, M., Rebolj, N., & Devetak, I. (2024). Environmental Content as a Part of Science-Oriented Sustainable Development Goals in Grades 6 and 7 of Slovenian Primary School: An Analysis of Science Textbooks. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.26529/CEPSJ.1792
Wu, X., & Zhi, Q. (2016). Impact of Shared Economy on Urban Sustainability: From the Perspective of Social, Economic, and Environmental Sustainability. Energy Procedia, 104, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.033
Yin, R. K. (2013). Applications of case study research (Vol. 34, p. 173). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e
Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A. (2025). The role of governance in large-scale mining sector in Latin America. Environmental Science & Policy, 168, 104071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104071
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
