EXPLORING HIGHER-ORDER AND LOWER-ORDER ORAL QUESTIONS: A REVISED BLOOMS’ TAXONOMY OF COGNITIVE ASPECTS IN UNDERGRADUATE EFL THESIS DEFENSE EXAMINATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n5.3803

Keywords:

Cognitive Aspects, Oral Question, Thesis Defense

Abstract

This study argues that the types of questions posed during undergraduate thesis defenses have a direct influence on candidates’ cognitive engagement. By examining the oral questions used in EFL thesis defenses, the research aims to clarify how these questions both reflect and shape the cognitive and academic expectations placed on the candidates. Specifically, the analysis examined the frequency of lower- and higher-order questions based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, using a mixed-methods approach and involving eleven lecturers. Data were gathered through direct observation and recordings of thesis defense sessions. The findings indicate a clear predominance of lower-order questions (68.86%), most of which targeted recall (40%) and comprehension (25%). In contrast, higher-order questions accounted to have for only 31.14%, encompassing to have analysis (21%), evaluation (8%), application (4%), and creation (2%). The findings show to have that comprehension-level questions primarily assess to have students’ understanding of their research choices, while higher-order questions although less common play to have a crucial role in fostering to have original thinking and encouraging to have deeper academic dialogue. These results underscore to have the need for a more balanced questioning strategy to strengthen to have students’ critical thinking skills and improve to have overall learning outcomes.

References

Abrar, M., Anastasia, I., Wachyunni, S., Failasofah, F., & Rico, F. M. (2024). Unveiling speaking challenges and overcoming strategies in thesis defence examination: a case study of EFL students at universitas Jambi. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 319–336. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v9i2.824

AlBadi, N. M., Nayan, N. A., & Rahman, N. A. (2025). Higher Order and Critical Thinking Skills in Asking Verbal Questions among English as a Foreign Language Teachers: A Systematic Review. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10709

Al-Sobh, M., Al-Zoubi, S., Khamaiseh, A. A., & Fawwaz, A. (2022). Question types in lecture rooms: EFL setting as an example. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature, 14(4), 951–964. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.4.12

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Astuti, S., & Rukmana, D. (2021). Student satisfaction on the implementation of the online undergraduate thesis examination: a PLS-SEM analysis. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(4), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-12-2020-0148

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I. McKay: New York

Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. In National Science Teachers Association eBooks. https://doi.org/10.2505/9780873551021

Chen, L., Lin, C., & Nguyen, K. C. (2024). The use of questions in Master’s oral defences in English as an academic lingua franca in universities. ESP Today, 12(2), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2024.12.2.4

Chang, Y. (2011). The use of questions by professors in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002

Dogan, C., Taraf, H. U., & Demi̇Rel, E. E. (2023). Examining pre-service elt teachers’ questioning strategies. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 13(2), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1268684

Febriyana, F. & Harjanto, I. (2023). Cognitive Levels of Questions by Indonesian Teachers of English. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(2), 2023, 127-138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8.i2.1032

Genc, E., & Yuksel, D. (2021). Teacher questions in English medium instruction classrooms in a Turkish higher education setting. Linguistics and Education, 66, 100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100992

Ginting, P., Hasnah, Y., Hasibuan, S. H., & Batubara, I. H. (2021). Evaluating cognitive level of final semester examination questions based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.385

Goodwin, S.S., Sharp, G.W., Cloutier, E.F., Diamond, N.A., and Dalgaard, K.A. (1983). Effective classroom questioning. University of Illinois-Urbana: Office of Instructional and Management Services. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED285497

Humaira, T. (2023). Assessing the impact of convergent thinking ability on english speaking proficiency. LLT Journal a Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5232

Irianti, L., Faridi, A., Pratama, H., & Suwandi, N. (2024). Flipped classroom and critical thinking on public speaking class. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2315815

Isnawati, I. (2023). EFL teachers’ assessment literacy. LLT Journal a Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.3654

Kamlasi, I. & Sahan, A. (2019). Analyzing and describing the oral questionings used by the prospective English teacher in EFL classroom. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Volume 5 (3), 384-399 https://ijicc.net/images/Vol_5_Iss_3/22_Kamlasi_P384_2019R.pdf

Köksal, D., Ulum, Ö. G., & Yürük, N. (2023). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy in reading texts in EFL/ESL settings. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0007

Mauch, J. E., & Birch, J. W. (2003). Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation: a handbook for students and faculty. https://catalog.umj.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=13374

Nouri, J., Larsson, K., & Saqr, M. (2019). Bachelor thesis analytics: using machine learning to predict dropout and identify performance factors. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI), 1(1), pp. 116–131. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v1i1.11065

Omari, H. A. (2018). Analysis of the types of classroom questions which Jordanian English language teachers ask. Modern Applied Science, 12(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n4p1

Pan, Y., Wang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Strategic questioning for formative assessment in TEFL: insights from blended synchronous learning environments. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04086-y

Pandey, G. P. (2022). Teachers’ experiences on the use of questioning strategy in Nepalese ELT classrooms. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 18(1), 791-803. Doi:10.52462/jlls.220

Pourhaji, M., Zahedi, M., & Saadatara, A. (2020). Types and functions of teachers’ questions during knowledge construction in EFL classroom discourse. English Teaching & Learning, 44(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-019-00045-y

Pratama, H., Nurkamto, J., Rustono, R., & Marmanto, S. (2017). Second language learners’ comprehension of conversational implicatures in English. 3L the Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(3), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2017-2303-04

Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press: New York

Samad, I. A., & Adnan, Z. (2017). Using a genre-based approach to prepare undergraduate students for an English thesis defence examination: an experimental study to address the ‘pedagogical controversy.’ Linguistik Indonesia, 35(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v35i1.56

Samad, I. A., Fitriani, S. S., Nomnian, S., Ys, S. B., & Sofia, S. (2024). Students’ and lecturers’ experiences in courses provided for the English thesis defence examinations. Deleted Journal, 11(1), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.33080

Tuela, A., & Palar, Y. (2022). Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Based on Bloom Taxonomy in Comprehensive Examination Questions. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 8(4), 957-971. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i4.5885

Vinte, J. V., & Çavuşoğlu, Ç. (2024). EFL Teachers’ beliefs and practices on the use of questions in Mozambican secondary schools. Mextesol Journal., 48(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v48n3-5

Wahyuni, S., Mujiyanto, J., Rukmini, D., & Fitriati, S. W. (2019). Examining teachers’ innovation in efl classrooms in promoting students’ autonomous learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 188. https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.64

Wang, S (2021). A guide to describing and teaching critical thinking (for ESP practitioners). ESP Today, 9(2) 340-345. https://www.esptodayjournal.org/pdf/june_2021/book_review/1_Simon_Wang.pdf

Watson, L. (2018). Educating for good questioning: a tool for intellectual virtues education. Acta Analytica, 33(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-018-0350-y

Wilen, W. W. (1991). Questioning skills, for teachers. what research says to the teacher. Third Edition.Washington: National Education Association

Widyantoro, A., Mukminatun, S., Nurharjanto, A. A., & Permatasari, I. (2024). A thematic analysis of examiners’ questions in master’s students’ thesis oral examination. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i2.74891

Zulkifli, H. & Hashim, R. (2019). The development of questioning skills through hikmah (wisdom) pedagogy. Creative Education, 10, 2593-2605. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012187

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

How to Cite

Kamlasi, I., Pratama, H., Wahyuni, S., & Bahri, S. (2025). EXPLORING HIGHER-ORDER AND LOWER-ORDER ORAL QUESTIONS: A REVISED BLOOMS’ TAXONOMY OF COGNITIVE ASPECTS IN UNDERGRADUATE EFL THESIS DEFENSE EXAMINATIONS. Veredas Do Direito, 22, e223803. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n5.3803