A NATURAL SCIENCE APPROACH TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT OF REGIONAL ECONOMIES IN THE CONTEXT OF A MULTIPOLAR WORLD FORMATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n6.3747

Keywords:

Sustainable Development, System "Nature-Society-Human", Parameters of Design and Management, Natural Science Units, Useful Power

Abstract

Modern socioeconomic systems are designed and managed without regard for the regenerative capacity of the natural environment or the fundamental laws of nature. This has generated trends whose consequences neither the planet nor humanity can sustain in the long term. Without deliberate, science-based management, it is fundamentally impossible to break free from the cycle of crises plaguing contemporary civilization and achieve genuine sustainable development. This article presents a multi-level model for designing, planning and managing the sustainable development of socioeconomic entities within an invariant coordinate system expressed in universal energy or power units of measurement. The novelty lies in identifying natural-science indicators of sustainability—across socioeconomic, technical, and environmental dimensions—and reducing them to a single energy-based metric applicable to systems open with respect to energy input and output. Calculations are based on Eurostat, World Bank, and United Nations databases.  The proposed methodology was tested using a dataset of the world's largest economies - USA, China, India, Brazil and small open economies as Latvia for the period 1990–2022. The results of the analysis demonstrate a significant discrepancy between traditional economic rankings and rankings based on physical invariants.

References

Abramov, V., Putilov, A. and Shamaeva, E (2023). Formation of mechanisms for managing the sustainable development of the economy of industrial sectors and complexes. Energy policy 2: 40–53. https://doi.org/10.46920/2409-5516_2023_2180_40

Abramov, V. I., Ostanina, S. S., Vodolazhskaya E. L (2016). The preconditions of economic management of problematic region in a federal state. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (2): P. 212–218

Bauer, E.S. (2002). Theoretical Biology, SPb: Rostok.

Baumol, W.J (1967). Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis. American Economic Review 57(3): 415–426.

Capra, F., Jakobsen, O.D. (2017). A conceptual frame-work for ecological economics based on systemic principles of life, International Journal of Social Economics, 44(6), pp. 831–844.

Costanza, R. (2004). Value theory and energy. Encyclopedia of Energy, 6, pp. 337-346.

Eurostat, Eurostat database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main /data/database. [01.02.2023]

Kaldor, N. (1967). Strategic Factors in Economic Development. New York: Ithaca.

Kaldor, N. (1996). Causes of Growth and Stagnation in the World Economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Kuznecov, P. (2015). Life Development Science, ISBN 978-5-905527-11-1, М.: РАЕН., 238

Odum, H.T. (2007). Environment, Power, and Society for twenty-first century. The hierarchy of Energy, Columbia university press, p.440.

Podolinsky, S. (2004). Socialism and the Unity of Physical Forces. Organization & Environment, 17(1), pp. 61-75.

Bolshakov, B.Y., Shamaeva, E.F., Karibaev, A., (2019). Introduction to the theory of management of novation’s with the use of spatiotemporal measures, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2116, 200009.

Trusina, I., (2025). System analysis of sustainable development. PhD Dissertation. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. https://doi.org/ 10.22616/lbtuthesis/2025.001

Trusina I, Jermolajeva E, Abramov V, Gopejenko V. (2024). World development assessment in an invariant coordinate system of energy units: The newly industrialized economies perspectives. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 8(3):3110. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i3.3110

Trusina, I., Jermolajeva, E. (2024). Assessing the sustainability of advanced and developing countries: A different perspective. Journal of Business, Management and Economics Engineering, VGTU, Vilnius, Lithuania, 22(1), pp. 96-111. DOI:10.3846/bmee.2024.19981.

Trusina, I., Jermolajeva, E., Gopejenko, V. (2023). Nonlinear Natural Scientific Thinking and Ecological Consciousness for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(2), pp. 165-186. DOI:10.2478/jtes-2023-0022

Trusina, I., Jermolajeva, E. (2022). Is Sustainable Development Really Sustainable – Theoretical Reflections, Statistics and the Need for Changes. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), pp. 166-179.

Trusina I., Jermolajeva E., Gopejenko V. (2021) Sustainable development design and management methodology using natural science units // Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development". Jelgava: LLU, 2021. № 55. P. 1–12.

UNDATA, United Nations Statistics Division. https://unstatsundesa.opendata.arcgis.com. [01.02.2025]

Vernadsky, V. (2006). Essays on Geochemistry and the Biosphere, Santa Fe, NM, Synergetic Press.

World bank, World Development Indicators. https://databank. worldbank.org /source/world- development-indicators. [01.02.2025]

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Trusina, I., Abramov, V., Mikhaylov, D., & Baranov, M. (2025). A NATURAL SCIENCE APPROACH TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT OF REGIONAL ECONOMIES IN THE CONTEXT OF A MULTIPOLAR WORLD FORMATION. Veredas Do Direito, 22(6), e223747. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n6.3747