REDUCING AIRLINE EMISSIONS INTENSITY WITH POLICY PACKAGES: A COMPARATIVE SYNTHESIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n2.3135Keywords:
Airline Emissions Intensity, Sustainable Aviation Fuel, Carbon Pricing, Emissions Monitoring, Emissions Verification, Emissions Trading SystemAbstract
This study examines how multi-layered policy packages relate to airline emissions intensity, measured as carbon dioxide per revenue passenger-kilometre (CO₂/RPK), for 2010–2025. A semi-systematic evidence synthesis and comparative policy analysis are employed. Five indicators are operationalised: cross-regime alignment, effective carbon price, Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) adoption, monitoring–reporting–verification (MRV) capacity, and access to green finance. Results indicate that stronger alignment and coverage, higher effective carbon prices, and scaled drop-in SAF are directionally associated with lower CO₂/RPK; robust MRV and finance channels amplify these links. Operational optimisation in descent profiles and routing provides complementary short-term gains, whereas cross-regime differences can raise compliance costs. An implementation roadmap is outlined: operations, long-term multi-source SAF portfolios, green financing, and MRV automation. Reliance on secondary sources and directional inference is acknowledged as a limitation. The framework provides a practical basis for reading instrument mixes against CO₂/RPK and for designing policy-aligned, cost-aware transition strategies.
References
Afşar, B., Bilgiç, H. B., Emen, M., Zarifoğlu, S., & Acar, S. (2023). Analyzing the EU ETS, challenges and opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation industry in Europe. Sustainability, 15(24), 16874. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416874
Ahmed, K., Bousson, K., & Coelho, M. d. F. (2021). A modified dynamic programming approach for 4D minimum fuel and emissions trajectory optimization. Aerospace, 8(5), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8050135
Anselmi, M. B. (2023). Conflictive climate governance architecture under the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Contexto Internacional, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.20234502e20220008
Arévalo, S. C. (2023). German environmental concerns on carbon offsetting and reduction: How it deals with European and international rules? Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 7(2), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.24843/ujlc.2023.v07.i02.p05
Axsen, J., Plötz, P., & Wolinetz, M. (2020). Crafting strong, integrated policy mixes for deep CO₂ mitigation in road transport. Nature Climate Change, 10(9), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0877-y
Aydoğan, E., & Çetek, C. (2022). Aircraft route optimization with simulated annealing for a mixed airspace composed of free and fixed route structures. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 95(4), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-11-2021-0343
Barbot, C., Betancor, O., Socorro, M. P., & Viecens, M. F. (2014). Trade-offs between environmental regulation and market competition: Airlines, emission trading systems and entry deterrence. Transport Policy, 33, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.008
Bardow, A., Minten, H., Hausweiler, J., Probst, B., Reinert, C., & Meys, R. (2025). Accounting for embodied emissions of chemicals within the European carbon border adjustment measure. Research Square (preprint). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5669037/v1
Baumber, A., Cross, R., Waters, C., Metternicht, G., & Kam, H. (2021). Understanding the social licence of carbon farming in the Australian rangelands. Sustainability, 14(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010174
Bergh, J. C. van den, Santa, J. C., Drews, S., Exadaktylos, F., Foramitti, J., Klein, F., … & Savin, I. (2021). Designing an effective climate-policy mix: Accounting for instrument synergy. Climate Policy, 21(6), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1907276
Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., Clark, H., Gryspeerdt, E., & Karadayi, J. (2023). Comparison of actual and time-optimized flight trajectories in the context of the In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System (IAGOS) programme. Aerospace, 10(9), 744. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10090744
Budak, T. G. (2025). Climate club. In Beyond treaties: Rethinking legal mechanisms for international climate governance (pp. 103–151). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86022-5_4
Budd, T., & Suau-Sanchez, P. (2016). Assessing the fuel burn and CO₂ impacts of the introduction of next generation aircraft: A study of a major European low-cost carrier. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 21, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.09.004
Capaz, R. S., Guida, E., Seabra, J. E. A., Osseweijer, P., & Posada, J. A. (2020). Mitigating carbon emissions through sustainable aviation fuels: Costs and potential. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 15(2), 502–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2168
Champeecharoensuk, A., Dhakal, S., & Chollacoop, N. (2023). Climate change mitigation in Thailand’s domestic aviation: Mitigation options analysis towards 2050. Energies, 16(20), 7199. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16207199
Cho, K. S., Li, G., & Bardell, N. (2020). Towards meeting the IATA-agreed 1.5% average annual fuel efficiency improvements between 2010 and 2020: The current progress being made by U.S. air carriers. Aviation, 23(4), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2019.12019
Chu, H. L., Do, N. T., Nguyen, L., Le, L., Ho, Q. A., Dang, K., & Ta, M. A. (2024). The economic impacts of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on developing countries: The case of Vietnam. Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/frep-03-2024-0011
Collis, J., Duch, K., & Schomäcker, R. (2022). Techno-economic assessment of jet fuel production using the Fischer–Tropsch process from steel mill gas. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 1049229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1049229
EASA. (2022). European Aviation Environmental Report 2022. European Union Aviation Safety Agency. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eaer-downloads//230217_EASA%20EAER%202022.pdf
Eichinger, R., Grewe, V., Dahlmann, K., Niklaß, M., Lau, A., Scheelhaase, J., … & Orozco, L. N. (2025). Bringing to life a monitoring, reporting and verification system for aviation non-CO₂ climate effects. EGUsphere. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2898
ESMA. (2025). Final report on the technical standards on the European Green Bonds Regulation (EuGB) (ESMA84-858037815-195). https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-02/ESMA84-858037815-195_Final_Report_on_Technical_Standards_under_EuGB.pdf
EU (2018). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions (MRR). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2018/2066/oj/eng
EU (2023a). Regulation (EU) 2023/2405 on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport (ReFuelEU Aviation). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2405/oj/eng
EU (2023b). Regulation (EU) 2023/956 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32023R0956
EU (2023c). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1773 of 17 August 2023 laying down the rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 regarding reporting obligations during the transitional period. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/1773/oj/eng
Fu, L. P., Wu, T., Zhong, X., & Gong, J. (2025). The dual effects of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on environmental quality in exporting enterprises’ locations: Mechanisms, case studies, and policy implications. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 19(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.54097/rkjrxt39
Guan, H., Liu, H., & Saadé, R. G. (2022). Analysis of carbon emission reduction in international civil aviation through the lens of shared triple bottom line value creation. Sustainability, 14(14), 8513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148513
Hjerpe, M., & Nasiritousi, N. (2015). Views on alternative forums for effectively tackling climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 864–867. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2684
Hooda, S. K., & Yadav, S. (2023). Green finance for sustainable aviation: Stakeholder perspectives and systematic review. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e02085. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.2085
IATA. (2019). Fact sheet: Fuel. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/25e5377cf53c4e48bbaa49d252f3ab03/fact-sheet-fuel.pdf
IATA. (2024). Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) handbook. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/d13875e9ed784f75bac90f000760e998/saf-handbook.pdf
IATA. (2025). Industry statistics fact sheet. https://www.iata.org/en/iata-repository/pressroom/fact-sheets/industry-statistics
ICAO. (2022). Assembly Resolution A41-21: Environmental protection – Climate change. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/climate-change
ICAO. (2023a). Assembly Resolution A41-20: Global aspirational goals and technology standards. https://www.icao.int/technology-goals-and-standards
ICAO. (2023b). Global framework on aviation cleaner energies. ICAO Conference on Aviation and Alternative Fuels (CAAF/3). https://www.icao.int/Meetings/CAAF3/Documents/ICA O%20Global%20Framework%20on%20Aviation%20Cleaner%20Energies_24Nov2023.pdf
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2024). Guidance on policies to promote sustainable aviation fuels (SAF). https://www2023.icao.int/environmental-protection/Pages/saf_guidance_potential_policies.aspx
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2025). Annex 16, Volume IV; Environmental Report; LTAG data. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/envrep2025
Liu, F., Li, Z., Xie, H., Yang, L., & Hu, M. (2021). Predicting fuel consumption reduction potentials based on 4D trajectory optimization with heterogeneous constraints. Sustainability, 13(13), 7043. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137043
Maertens, S., Grimme, W., Scheelhaase, J., & Jung, M. (2019). Options to continue the EU ETS for aviation in a CORSIA-world. Sustainability, 11(20), 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205703
Mannhardt, J., Gabrielli, P., & Sansavini, G. (2024). Understanding the vicious cycle of myopic foresight and constrained technology deployment in transforming the European energy system. iScience, 27(12), 111369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111369
Matthes, S., Grewe, V., Dahlmann, K., Frömming, C., Irvine, E. A., Lim, L., … & Yin, F. (2017). A concept for multi-criteria environmental assessment of aircraft trajectories. Aerospace, 4(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace4030042
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). DAC blended finance principles for unlocking commercial finance for the SDGs. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/12/oecd-dac-blended-finance-principles_898d3549/dc66bd9c-en.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Scaling up blended finance in developing countries. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/11/scaling-up-blended-finance-in-developing-countries_4d47ff2c/2fb14da0-en.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). Pricing greenhouse gas emissions 2024. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/11/pricing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2024_173c47f4/b44c74e6-en.pdf
Rădulescu, M., Hossain, M. R., Alofaysan, H., & Mohammed, K. S. (2024). Do emission trading systems, green technology, and environmental governance matter for environmental quality? Evidence from the European Union. International Journal of Environmental Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00667-6
Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004
Ryerson, M. S., Hansen, M., Hao, L., & Seelhorst, M. (2015). Landing on empty: Estimating the benefits from reducing fuel uplift in US civil aviation. Environmental Research Letters, 10(9), 094002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094002
Schaefer, M., Scheelhaase, J., Grimme, W., & Maertens, S. (2010). The economic impact of the upcoming EU emissions trading system on airlines and EU member states—An empirical estimation. European Transport Research Review, 2(4), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-010-0038-x
Scheelhaase, J., Schaefer, M., Grimme, W., & Maertens, S. (2012). Cost impacts of the inclusion of air transport into the European Emissions Trading Scheme in the time period 2012–2020. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2012.12.4.2973
Şafak, Ö., Çavuş, Ö., & Aktürk, M. S. (2018). Multi-stage airline scheduling problem with stochastic passenger demand and non-cruise times. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 114, 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.05.012
Şafak, Ö., Gürel, S. N., & Aktürk, M. S. (2017). Integrated aircraft-path assignment and robust schedule design with cruise speed control. Computers & Operations Research, 84, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.03.005
Tan, E. C. D., Harris, K., Tifft, S. M., Steward, D., Kinchin, C., & Thompson, T. N. (2022). Adoption of biofuels for marine shipping decarbonization: A long-term price and scalability assessment. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 16(4), 942–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2350
Tian, Y., Wan, L., Ye, B., Yin, R., & Xing, D. (2019). Optimization method for reducing the air pollutant emission and aviation noise of arrival in terminal area. Sustainability, 11(17), 4715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174715
Trejo-Pech, C. O., Larson, J. A., English, B. C., & Yu, T. E. (2019). Cost and profitability analysis of a prospective pennycress to sustainable aviation fuel supply chain in the southern USA. Energies, 12(16), 3055. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163055
U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE), Alternative Fuels Data Center. (2025). Sustainable aviation fuel tax credits: §40B SAF; §45Z clean fuel production. https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/sustainable-aviation-fuel
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
Wiedemann, R., & Ingold, K. (2021). Solving cross-sectoral policy problems: Adding a cross-sectoral dimension to assess policy performance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 24(5), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1960809
Wulandari, F., Schhfer, D., Andreas, S., & Sun, C. (2018). Liquidity risk and yield spreads of green bonds. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161323
Yıldız, M., Mutlu, S., Nagy, A., & Kale, U. (2023). Solar energy for airport ground support equipment: A quantitative study. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 95(5), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-08-2022-0211
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
