ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND LECTURER RETENTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: BIBLIOGRAPHY ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Authors

  • Hoang Thanh Tung
  • Dinh Thi Mung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n2.3259

Keywords:

Organizational Commitment, Faculty Retention, Higher Education, Digital Transformation, ESG, Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

Retaining faculty members is now a strategic priority for higher education institutions. Findings confirm that organizational commitment continues to serve as a central theoretical construct, yet its explanatory strength is increasingly challenged by new themes such as well-being, work–life balance, and sustainable human resource practices. At the same time, the rapid expansion of scholarly output calls for a systematic review to capture both the evolution and the fragmentation of this research domain. This study applies a bibliometric approach to 740 publications indexed in Scopus between 2015 and 2025, processed through Bibliometrix (R) and VOSviewer. Our analysis suggests that research production has grown at a CAGR of 7.12%, which reflects not only numerical expansion but also notable thematic diversification. The results notably reveal a shift from traditional frameworks such as job satisfaction and turnover intention toward multidimensional perspectives that integrate leadership, digital transformation, and faculty well-being. By contrast, ESG, Green HRM, and sustainability remain underrepresented, leaving a significant gap for further inquiry. The study argues that addressing this gap requires linking organizational commitment with digital and sustainable practices to strengthen faculty retention, particularly in emerging economies and private universities. Taken together, the findings enrich theoretical understanding while also offering practical insights for policy and management, underscoring the importance of collaborative and interdisciplinary approaches for the future of higher education research.

References

1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691575

2. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043

3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

4. Donthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.008

5. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

6. Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 954–985. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0849

7. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing.

8. Jabbour, C. J. C., & Santos, F. C. A. (2008). The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(12), 2133–2154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802479389

9. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088

10. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

11. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307

12. Raineri, N. (2017). Linking human resources practices with organizational commitment: Evidence from Chile. Employee Relations, 39(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2016-0035

13. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x

14. Turner, T., Huemann, M., & Keegan, A. (2008). Human resource management in the project-oriented organization: Employee well-being and ethical treatment. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.005

15. Van der Heijden, B. I., Peeters, M. C., Le Blanc, P. M., & Van Breukelen, W. (2018). Job characteristics and experience as predictors of occupational turnover intention and occupational turnover in the European nursing sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.008

16. Zacher, H., & Winter, G. (2011). Eldercare demands, strain, and work engagement: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.020

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

Tung, H. T., & Mung, D. T. (2025). ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND LECTURER RETENTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: BIBLIOGRAPHY ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION. Veredas Do Direito, 22(2), e3259. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n2.3259