HIGHER EDUCATION AS A HUMAN RIGHT IN PRISON: POLICY IMPLEMENTATION GAPS AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN ECUADOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.8258Keywords:
Prison Higher Education, Policy Implementation, Right to Education, Human Development, EcuadorAbstract
This article examines the gap between the formal recognition and material realisation of the right to higher education for incarcerated people in Ecuador. Drawing on a qualitative single-case study, the research combines documentary analysis of constitutional, legal and policy frameworks with semi-structured interviews with public policy experts, university administrators and incarcerated or formerly incarcerated students. The findings show that Ecuador has developed a rights-based legal architecture that recognises persons deprived of liberty as a priority group and frames education as part of rehabilitation and social inclusion. However, the implementation of higher education in prison remains constrained by unstable funding, restricted access to digital technologies, weakly formalised procedures, security-driven logistics, uneven pedagogical adaptation and fragile mechanisms for academic continuity. The article argues that rights-based recognition is necessary but insufficient: higher education becomes a real educational capability only when supported by institutional capacity, sustained public investment, secure but meaningful connectivity, differentiated academic support and stable governance arrangements between prison authorities and higher education institutions. By analysing Ecuador as a Global South case, the study contributes to debates on educational development, human rights and social justice by showing how formally recognised educational rights may remain partially symbolic when implementation capacity is insufficient.
References
Asamblea Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial No. 449, 20 de octubre de 2008.
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2010). Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior. Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 298, 12 de octubre de 2010.
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 180, 10 de febrero de 2014.
Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing experts. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bozick, R., Steele, J., Davis, L., & Turner, S. (2018). Does providing inmates with education improve postrelease outcomes? A meta-analysis of correctional education programs in the United States. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14, 389–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9334-6
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Davis, L. M., Bozick, R., Steele, J. L., Saunders, J., & Miles, J. N. V. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR266
Erisman, W., & Contardo, J. B. (2005). Learning to reduce recidivism: A 50-state analysis of postsecondary correctional education policy. Institute for Higher Education Policy.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: Can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378
López-Armijos, G., & Ponce de León Romero, L. (2025). University distance education in prisons as a tool for rehabilitation and social inclusion. Social Sciences, 14(5), Article 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050277
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Servicio Nacional de Atención Integral a Personas Adultas Privadas de la Libertad y a Adolescentes Infractores [SNAI]. (2020). Reglamento del Sistema Nacional de Rehabilitación Social.
Stickle, B., & Schuster, S. S. (2023). Are schools in prison worth it? The effects and economic returns of prison education. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 1263–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-023-09747-3
Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low-income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.06.001
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931
Western, B., Braga, A. A., Davis, J., & Sirois, C. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512–1547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681301
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
