DEEPFAKE METAPHORS IN GERMAN AND TURKISH MEDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.8149Keywords:
Conceptual Metaphor, Deepfake, Disinformation, Epistemic Security, Media DiscourseAbstract
This article investigates how deepfakes are metaphorically conceptualised in German and Turkish media discourse. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis and metaphor scenario analysis, it examines how news texts construct deepfakes as threats to truth, trust and democracy. The consolidated analytical corpus contains 85 media items and 530 lexical-unit coding rows, comprising 327 German and 203 Turkish rows. Metaphor identification follows a MIPVU-informed procedure combined with source- and target-domain grouping, critical interpretation and cross-linguistic comparison. The findings show recurrent WAR/ATTACK, THREAT, TRAP, MASK, VISION/DETECTION and EROSION/STRUCTURE scenarios. The German subcorpus foregrounds democratic vulnerability, elections, journalism and regulation, whereas the Turkish subcorpus more strongly foregrounds fraud, social engineering, user warning and identity manipulation. The article argues that these metaphors do more than describe technological risks: they distribute agency and vulnerability, legitimise protective responses and construct deepfakes as a problem of epistemic security.
References
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Equinox.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2018). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954
Deignan, A., & Semino, E. (2010). Corpus techniques for metaphor analysis. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 161–179). Equinox.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980)
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. John Wiley & Sons.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, A. (2016). Metaphor scenario analysis as part of cultural linguistics. tekst i dyskurs – text und diskurs, 9, 47–67.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins.
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.
Westerlund, M. (2019). The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 39–52.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
