DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND FEMICIDE: A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE 2008–2024 PERIOD IN TÜRKIYE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.8112Keywords:
Domestic Violence, Violence Against Women, Femicide, Gender Inequality, Patriarchy, Intimate-Partner Violence, Power and Control, Protection Orders, Family Sociology, TürkiyeAbstract
This study examines domestic violence and femicide in Türkiye from a sociological perspective, focusing on data from the period between 2008 and 2024. It approaches femicide not as a series of isolated criminal acts but as the most severe and irreversible consequence of a prolonged cycle of physical, psychological, sexual, economic, and digital violence. The study evaluates the subject within the framework of patriarchal social structures, gender inequality, economic dependency, cultural norms, power and control relations, and the effectiveness of legal and social-protection mechanisms. The theoretical framework draws on the sociological approaches of Émile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons, Pierre Bourdieu, and Anthony Giddens, together with feminist theory, hegemonic masculinity, social-learning theory, and the ecological model. The empirical analysis covers annual femicide figures, the pretexts advanced by perpetrators, perpetrator–victim relationships, methods and instruments of killing, victims’ marital and parental status, protection orders, age groups, employment status, and the locations in which the murders occurred. The findings demonstrate that femicides in Türkiye are committed predominantly by husbands, former husbands, intimate partners, and other family members. A considerable proportion of these murders occur in the home, showing the strong continuity between domestic violence and femicide. Separation, divorce, rejection, jealousy, and women’s attempts to make independent decisions concerning their lives emerge not as legitimate causes but as pretexts reflecting perpetrators’ desire to preserve power and control. Firearms and sharp instruments are among the most frequently used means of killing, while the existence of victims with protection orders indicates shortcomings in the implementation and monitoring of protective measures. The study concludes that criminal sanctions alone are insufficient to prevent femicide. Effective prevention requires early risk assessment, rigorous enforcement of protection orders, control of individual armament, accessible psychosocial and economic support, coordinated institutional intervention, gender-sensitive education, and social policies aimed at transforming patriarchal norms and unequal power relations. Protecting women’s right to life therefore requires a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and long-term policy approach.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. Free Press.
Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2022). Cyber violence against women and girls. Publications Office of the European Union.
Gelles, R. J. (1997). Intimate violence in families (3rd ed.). Sage.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press.
Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2021). Sociology (9th ed.). Polity Press.
Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002
Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. Macmillan.
Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Free Press.
Russell, D. E. H. (1992). Femicide: The power of naming. In J. Radford & D. E. H. Russell (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman killing (pp. 3–12). Twayne Publishers.
Russell, D. E. H., & Harmes, R. A. (Eds.). (2001). Femicide in global perspective. Teachers College Press.
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Family and Social Services. (2022). Research on domestic violence against women in Türkiye. General Directorate on the Status of Women.
UN Women, & United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Gender-related killings of women and girls (Femicide/Feminicide): Global estimates of female intimate partner/family-related homicides in 2022.
United Nations. (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women (A/RES/48/104).
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, & UN Women. (2023). Gender-related killings of women and girls (Femicide/Feminicide): Global estimates of gender-related killings of women and girls in the private sphere in 2022. United Nations.
Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell.
World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. World Health Organization.
Yılmaz, E., & Ören, B. (2021). The representation of violence against women and femicide in the media. Atatürk University Journal of Women’s Studies, 3(1), 46–53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
