DIGITAL LOGISTICS AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT FOR CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT IN ENERGY PROJECTS

Authors

  • Mohammed Javeed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.8074

Keywords:

Digital Logistics, Calibration Equipment, Inventory Management, Rfid, Internet of Things, Digital Twin, Traceability, Energy Projects

Abstract

Calibration equipment is mobile, sensitive, costly, and shared across laboratories and project sites. Insufficient control over its identity, location, calibration status, transport condition, custody, accessories, and return schedule can delay commissioning, result in unnecessary purchases, and expose energy projects to invalid measurements. This structured review investigates how digital logistics and inventory management enhance the availability, traceability, and lifecycle control of calibration equipment. Thirty publications from 2020 to 2025 were synthesised using PRISMA 2020 principles. The evidence demonstrates that radio-frequency identification, barcodes, Internet of Things sensors, mobile workflows, digital calibration certificates, cloud platforms, digital twins, analytics, and selective blockchain services can establish a reliable chain of custody from laboratory release to field use and return. The main benefits include improved visibility, reduced identification errors, enhanced status control, more accurate forecasting, faster dispatch, and stronger audit evidence. The principal risks involve inaccurate master data, metal-related RFID interference, fragmented interfaces, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, excessive automation, and insufficient governance of exceptions. This paper outlines a six-layer traceable asset-control framework encompassing asset identity, metrological status, physical visibility, logistics execution, inventory intelligence, and governance, and presents a phased roadmap for energy projects. The review concludes that digital inventory management should not treat calibration instruments as ordinary warehouse items. Each item must be managed as a measurement asset whose location, condition, configuration, traceability, and authorised use remain connected throughout its functioning lifecycle.

References

1. Agrawal, T.K., Kumar, V., Pal, R., Wang, L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Blockchain-based framework for supply chain traceability: A case example of textile and clothing industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154, 107130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107130

2. Cetinkaya, A., Kaya, M.C., Danaci, E., & Oguztuzun, H. (2024). Uncertainty calculation as a service: Integrating cloud-based microservices for enhanced calibration and DCC generation. Sensors, 24(17), 5651. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175651

3. Choi, T.-M., & Siqin, T. (2022). Blockchain in logistics and production from Blockchain 1.0 to Blockchain 5.0: An intra-inter-organizational framework. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 160, 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102653

4. Félix-Cigalat, J.S., & Domingo, R. (2023). Towards a digital twin warehouse through the optimization of internal transport. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 4652. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084652

5. Gerlach, B., Zarnitz, S., Nitsche, B., & Straube, F. (2021). Digital supply chain twins—Conceptual clarification, use cases and benefits. Logistics, 5(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040086

6. Hackel, S., Schönhals, S., Doering, L., Engel, T., & Baumfalk, R. (2023). The Digital Calibration Certificate (DCC) for an end-to-end digital quality infrastructure for Industry 4.0. Sci, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci5010011

7. He, Y., & Gao, Z. (2023). Joint optimization of preventive maintenance and spare parts ordering considering imperfect detection. Systems, 11(9), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090445

8. Helo, P., & Shamsuzzoha, A.H.M. (2020). Real-time supply chain—A blockchain architecture for project deliveries. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 63, 101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101909

9. Ho, G.T.S., Tang, Y.M., Tsang, K.Y., Tang, V., & Chau, K.Y. (2021). A blockchain-based system to enhance aircraft parts traceability and trackability for inventory management. Expert Systems with Applications, 179, 115101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115101

10. Hong, K., Ren, Y., Li, F., Mao, W., & Gao, X. (2023). Robust interval prediction of intermittent demand for spare parts based on tensor optimization. Sensors, 23(16), 7182. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23167182

11. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32(9), 775-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450

12. Jeschke, S., & Grassmann, R. (2021). Development of a generic implementation strategy of digital twins in logistics systems under consideration of German rail transport. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10289. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110289

13. Kaiblinger, A., & Woschank, M. (2022). State of the art and future directions of digital twins for production logistics: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 12(2), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020669

14. Kampa, A. (2023). Modeling and simulation of a digital twin of a production system for Industry 4.0 with work-in-process synchronization. Applied Sciences, 13(22), 12261. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212261

15. Kim, J.-D., Kim, T.-H., & Han, S.W. (2023). Demand forecasting of spare parts using artificial intelligence: A case study of K-X tanks. Mathematics, 11(3), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030501

16. Moshood, T.D., Nawanir, G., Sorooshian, S., & Okfalisa, O. (2021). Digital twins driven supply chain visibility within logistics: A new paradigm for future logistics. Applied System Innovation, 4(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020029

17. Mustapää, T., Nummiluikki, J., & Viitala, R. (2022). Digitalization of calibration data management in pharmaceutical industry using a multitenant platform. Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7531. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157531

18. Mustapää, T., Koskinen, S., Sundfors, M., Jonsson, J., Riska, K., Löytynoja, L., & Broo, J.-A. (2024). Enabling the use of digital calibration certificates in industrial calibration management systems. Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems, 13, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-13-71-2024

19. Nummiluikki, J., Saxholm, S., Kärkkäinen, A., & Koskinen, S. (2023). Digital Calibration Certificate in an industrial application. Acta IMEKO, 12(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v12i1.1402

20. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

21. Park, J., Kim, Y.-J., & Lee, B.K. (2020). Passive radio-frequency identification tag-based indoor localization in multi-stacking racks for warehousing. Applied Sciences, 10(10), 3623. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103623

22. Pawlewski, P., Kosacka-Olejnik, M., & Werner-Lewandowska, K. (2021). Digital twin lean intralogistics: Research implications. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041495

23. Seifermann, S., Murti, I.H., & Oberle, J. (2022). Tracking and tracing in manufacturing supply chains using blockchain technology. Procedia CIRP, 115, 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.10.069

24. Shafi, I., Sohail, A., Ahmad, J., Martínez Espinosa, J.C., Dzul López, L.A., Bautista Thompson, E., & Ashraf, I. (2023). Spare parts forecasting and lumpiness classification using neural network model and its impact on aviation safety. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5475. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095475

25. Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023). Internet of things for smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.006.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

How to Cite

Javeed, M. (2026). DIGITAL LOGISTICS AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT FOR CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT IN ENERGY PROJECTS. Veredas Do Direito, 23(14), e238074. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.8074