PENSAMIENTO CRÍTICO Y TECNOLOGÍAS DISRUPTIVAS: CONCEPCIONES Y EXPECTATIVAS DE ESTUDIANTES DE EDUCACIÓN MEDIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.7238

Keywords:

Pensamiento Crítico, Inteligencia Artificial, Realidad Aumentada, Realidad Virtual, Concepciones

Abstract

El pensamiento crítico constituye una competencia fundamental en la educación media, especialmente en un contexto donde las tecnologías disruptivas adquieren un papel creciente en los procesos de aprendizaje. Esta investigación analizó las concepciones y expectativas de estudiantes de educación media sobre el pensamiento crítico, así como su percepción frente a la contribución de la inteligencia artificial, la realidad aumentada y la realidad virtual en su formación académica. El estudio se desarrolló bajo un enfoque descriptivo, organizado en dos fases: la primera orientada a identificar las concepciones sobre el pensamiento crítico y la segunda a explorar expectativas y percepciones respecto a la integración educativa de estas tecnologías. Participaron 55 estudiantes, quienes respondieron un cuestionario validado mediante V de Aiken = 0,88, compuesto por preguntas abiertas y cerradas. Los resultados muestran que los estudiantes conciben el pensamiento crítico principalmente como una habilidad analítica asociada con la interpretación de información y la resolución de problemas, aunque otorgan menor relevancia a habilidades más profundas como la autorregulación y la evaluación. Asimismo, reconocen el potencial pedagógico de estas tecnologías, pero expresan preocupaciones frente a sus riesgos éticos y a una posible dependencia tecnológica. Estos hallazgos permiten orientar futuras intervenciones didácticas basadas en tecnologías disruptivas para fortalecer el pensamiento crítico.

References

Campillo-Ferrer, J. M., López-García, A., & Miralles-Sánchez, P. (2025). Student Perceptions of the Use of Gen-AI in a Higher Education Program in Spain. Digital, 5(3), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5030029

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Da Silva, M. A., & Fernandes, E. F. (2019). O projeto educação 2030 da OCDE: uma bússola para a aprendizagem. Revista Exitus, 9(5), 271–300. https://doi.org/10.24065/2237-9460.2019v9n5ID1108

Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2023). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality–Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes. Science & Education, 32(4), 1165–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–23.

Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts (2020 update). East Tennessee State University. Recuperado Https://Www.Etsu.Edu/Teaching/Documents/Whatwhy.Pdf?

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2022). Metodología de la investigación (7.a ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-607-15-2154-3.

Icfes. (2024). Informe nacional de resultados del examen Saber 11° 2023.

Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Kallunki, V., Mundy, D., Romero, M., Romeu, T., & Gouseti, A. (2023). Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review. Review of Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3425

Lancheros-Bohorquez, W. F., & Vesga-Bravo, G. J. (2024). Uso de la realidad aumentada, la realidad virtual y la inteligencia artificial en educación secundaria: una revisión sistemática. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 14(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.20278306.v14.n1.2024.17537

Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Students’ Mobile Phone Practices for Academic Purposes: Strengthening Post-Pandemic University Digitalization. Sustainability, 14(22), 14958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214958

OCDE. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Orhan, A. (2023). Fake news detection on social media: the predictive role of university students’ critical thinking dispositions and new media literacy. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00248-8

Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Intellectual standards essential to reasoning well within every domain of human thought, Part 4. Journal of Developmental Education, 37(4), 33.

Penfield, R. D., & Giacobbi, Jr. , P. R. (2004). Applying a Score Confidence Interval to Aiken’s Item Content-Relevance Index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3

Redaelli, S., Biller-Andorno, N., Gloeckler, S., Brown, J., Spitale, G., & Germani, F. (2025). Mastering critical thinking skills is strongly associated with the ability to recognize fakeness and misinformation. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1577692

Sánchez-Vera, F. (2025). Critical Algorithmic Mediation: Rethinking Cultural Transmission and Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Societies, 15(7), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15070198

Santamaría-Cárdaba, N., Gajardo, K., Iglesias, J. C., & Ortega-Quevedo, V. (2024). Global Education and Critical Thinking: A Necessary Symbiosis to Educate for Critical Global Citizenship. Open Education Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0010

Skulmowski, A. (2023). Ethical issues of educational virtual reality. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100023

Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Jumbo, F. T. (2020). Digital Literacy and Higher Education during COVID-19 Lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications, 8(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040048

UNESCO. (2021). Reimaginar juntos nuestros futuros: un nuevo contrato social para la educación.

van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2020). Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: teacher perceptions and practices. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 25(4), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313

Zuurmond, A., Guérin, L., van der Ploeg, P., & van Riet, D. (2024). Learning to question the status quo. Critical thinking, citizenship education and Bildung in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 76(5), 1185–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2166573

Downloads

Published

2026-07-09

How to Cite

Bohorquez, W. F. L., Bravo, G. J. V., & Cedeño, E. F. A. (2026). PENSAMIENTO CRÍTICO Y TECNOLOGÍAS DISRUPTIVAS: CONCEPCIONES Y EXPECTATIVAS DE ESTUDIANTES DE EDUCACIÓN MEDIA. Veredas Do Direito, 23(11), e237238. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.7238

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 11 (2026): Veredas do Direito, v. 23, n. 11 2026

Section

Articles

License

I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.

I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.

 

Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0