RISK-BASED INTEGRITY AND FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-PRESSURE MULTIPHASE PIPELINES IN SAUDI ARABIA: INTEGRATING ADVANCED STRESS ANALYSIS, AIV/FIV SCREENING, AND ASME B31.4/B31.8 COMPLIANCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.7165

Keywords:

High-Pressure Pipelines, Multiphase Flow, Risk-Based Integrity, Fatigue Assessment, Acoustic-Induced Vibration, Flow-Induced Vibration, Asme B31.4, Asme B31.8, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Saudi Arabia is expanding gas, liquids and industrial pipeline networks while existing high-pressure assets continue to operate under severe desert terrain, temperature gradients, flow assurance constraints and increasingly complex multiphase production. These conditions make integrity assurance a coupled problem rather than a sequence of separate code checks, because static stress margins, corrosion allowance, vibration fatigue, construction quality, pressure cycling and inspection confidence influence the same probability of failure. This review develops a risk-based framework for high-pressure multiphase pipelines that integrates advanced stress analysis, acoustic-induced vibration and flow-induced vibration screening, fatigue assessment, defect management and ASME B31.4/B31.8 compliance. The aim is to synthesise recent engineering literature and standards from 2020 to 2025 into a practical decision model suitable for Saudi pipeline operators, engineering contractors and asset integrity teams. The paper applies a structured narrative review, comparing design-code obligations, fitness-for-service methods, in-line inspection technologies, corrosion and cracking prediction, and vibration integrity practice. The review shows that code compliance remains necessary but insufficient when multiphase flow produces slugging, turbulence, valve noise, small-bore branch excitation and local dynamic stress amplification. A robust assurance strategy therefore requires early screening, finite-element stress modelling, fatigue life estimation, risk ranking, inspection verification and management-of-change feedback. The proposed framework emphasises traceable assumptions, conservative data treatment, human expert review and staged escalation from screening to detailed simulation. The study contributes a Saudi-specific synthesis that connects compliance, risk and operational integrity, and it identifies research needs in validated vibration datasets, field-calibrated digital twins, Saudi environmental loading and uncertainty-aware fatigue models.

References

[1] ASME. ASME B31.4-2022: Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquids and Slurries. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2022.

[2] ASME. ASME B31.8-2022: Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2022.

[3] ASME. ASME B31.8S-2022: Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2022.

[4] API and ASME. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1: Fitness-For-Service. American Petroleum Institute and American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Washington, DC, 2021.

[5] API. API Recommended Practice 1160: Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2024.

[6] API. API Recommended Practice 1176: Assessment and Management of Cracking in Pipelines. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2022.

[7] API. API Standard 1163: In-Line Inspection Systems Qualification. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2021.

[8] DNV. DNV-ST-F101: Submarine Pipeline Systems. DNV, Hovik, 2021.

[9] DNV. DNV-RP-F105: Free Spanning Pipelines. DNV, Hovik, 2021.

[10] DNV. DNV-RP-C203: Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures. DNV, Hovik, 2021.

[11] Aramco. Aramco's Strategic Gas Expansion Progresses with 25 Billion USD Contract Awards. Aramco News, Dhahran, 2024.

[12] Reuters. Sinopec Unit Agrees 1.1 Billion USD Deal to Build Gas Pipelines for Saudi Aramco. Reuters Energy News, 2024.

[13] Hussain, M.. Zhang, T.. Chaudhry, M.. Jamil, I.. Kausar, S.. Hussain, I. Review of prediction of stress corrosion cracking in gas pipelines using machine learning. Machines, 2024, 12, 42.

[14] Sarwar, U.. Liu, Z.. Ahmad, R.. Khan, F. Enhancing pipeline integrity: a comprehensive review of machine learning applications and future challenges. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2024, 4, 100200.

[15] Soomro, A.A.. Mokhtar, A.A.. Kurnia, J.C.. Lashari, N.. Lu, H.. Sambo, C. Integrity assessment of corroded oil and gas pipelines using machine learning: a systematic review. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131, 105810.

[16] Coelho, L.B.. Zhang, D.. Van Ingelgem, Y.. Steckelmacher, D.. Nowe, A.. Terryn, H. Reviewing machine learning of corrosion prediction in a data-oriented perspective. npj Materials Degradation, 2022, 6, 8.

[17] Alamri, A.H. Application of machine learning to stress corrosion cracking risk assessment. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 2022, 31, 11-21.

[18] Liu, G.. Ayello, F.. Vera, J.. Eckert, R.. Bhat, P. Machine learning approaches to determine erosion rates for liquid hydrocarbon transmission pipelines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 295, 126478.

[19] Lu, H.. Peng, H.. Xu, Z.D.. Qin, G.. Azimi, M.. Matthews, J.C.. Cao, L. Theory and machine learning modelling for burst pressure estimation of pipelines with multipoint corrosion. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2023, 14, 04023022.

[20] Peng, X.. Anyaoha, U.. Liu, Z.. Tsukada, K. Analysis of magnetic-flux-leakage data for pipeline corrosion assessment. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2020, 56, 1-15.

[21] Khakzad, S.. Yang, M.. Lohi, A.. Khakzad, N. Probabilistic failure assessment of oil pipelines due to internal corrosion. Process Safety Progress, 2022, 41, 793-803.

[22] Sheikh, M.F.. Kamal, K.. Rafique, F.. Sabir, S.. Zaheer, H.. Khan, K. Corrosion detection and severity level prediction using acoustic emission and machine-learning based approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2021, 12, 3891-3903.

[23] Haile, S.G.. Woschke, E.. Tibba, G.S.. Pandey, V. Internal two-phase flow-induced vibrations: a review. Cogent Engineering, 2022, 9, 2083472.

[24] Miwa, S.. Mori, M.. Hibiki, T. State-of-the-art in plant component flow-induced vibration. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science, 2020, 6, 031301.

[25] Bachoo, R.. Singh, A. Flow-induced vibrations of oil and gas piping systems. West Indian Journal of Engineering, 2021, 43, 54-68.

[26] Emmerson, P.R.. Lewis, M.. Barton, N.. Orr, S.. Lunde, K. Flow-induced vibration analysis of topside piping at high pressure. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2021, 73, 58-64.

[27] Song, W.. Li, Y.. Zhang, X.. Wang, J. Flow pattern evolution and flow-induced vibration response of a rigid M-shaped subsea jumper under oil-gas-water multiphase flow. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 293, 116682.

[28] Ding, L.. Zhang, X.. Wang, Y.. Li, H. Review of vibration induced by gas-liquid two-phase flow in pipes. Ocean Engineering, 2025, 321, 120182.

[29] Mohamed, A.. Hamed, M.. El-Sayed, M.. Ibrahim, A. Assessing the risk of vibration-induced fatigue in process pipework using convolutional neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 260, 125460.

[30] Vishnuvardhan, S.. Murthy, A.R.. Choudhary, A. A review on pipeline failures, defects in pipelines and their assessment and fatigue life prediction methods. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2023, 201, 104853.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Valluri, S. (2026). RISK-BASED INTEGRITY AND FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-PRESSURE MULTIPHASE PIPELINES IN SAUDI ARABIA: INTEGRATING ADVANCED STRESS ANALYSIS, AIV/FIV SCREENING, AND ASME B31.4/B31.8 COMPLIANCE. Veredas Do Direito, 23(14), e237165. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.7165