DIGITAL TAX ADMINISTRATION QUALITY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND CORPORATE COMPLIANCE INTENTION: THE MODERATING ROLE OF TRANSPARENCY CONCERN

Authors

  • Sabar Pardamean Lumbantobing
  • Yudhistira Adwimurti
  • Etty Murwaningsih
  • Mohamad Hafiz bin Rosli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5160

Keywords:

Perceived Coretax Service Quality, Perceived Accountability, Corporate Tax Compliance Intention, Transparency Concern, Digital Tax Administration

Abstract

The rapid shift toward digital tax administration has forced corporate taxpayers to recalibrate their compliance strategies in algorithmic environments. Prior research on integrated digital tax platforms reports mixed evidence on whether perceived service quality, fairness, and accountability drive compliance, suggesting boundary conditions. This study tests the effects of Perceived Core Tax Administration System (Coretax) Service Quality, Perceived Fairness, and Perceived Accountability on Corporate Tax Compliance Intention, with Transparency Concern as a moderator. Using a positivist quantitative design, we analyze cross-sectional survey data from 412 Tax Managers, Finance Controllers, and Accounting Managers in firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (fiscal year 2025). The model combines the DeLone and McLean IS Success Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Slippery Slope Framework, estimated using PLS-SEM. Sensitivity tests compare expanded versus baseline service-quality dimensions. Findings show that perceived service quality and accountability significantly increase compliance intention, whereas fairness has no direct effect. Transparency Concern lowers compliance intention but strengthens the accountability–compliance link, indicating a complementary dynamic. While the cross-sectional design limits causal claims, results show transparency concerns can amplify accountability. Policymakers should pair digital infrastructure upgrades with clear accountability communication. The study empirically validates an expanded eight-dimensional digital tax service-quality construct with improved predictive validity in an emerging-market context.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991a). Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.The theory of planned behavior. In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (Vol. 50, Issue 2).

Ajzen, I. (1991b). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Albar, Mooduto, H. A., Dahlan, A. A., Yuhefizar, Erwadi, & Napitupulu, D. (2017). E-Government Service Quality Based on E-GovQual Approach Case Study in West Sumatera Province. 7(6), 2337–2342. https://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php/ijaseit/article/download/4226/pdf_618/10065

Aysolmaz, B., Müller, R., & Meacham, D. (2023). The public perceptions of algorithmic decision-making systems: Results from a large-scale survey. Telematics and Informatics, 79, 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101954

Capasso, S., Cicatiello, L., De Simone, E., Gaeta, G. L., & Mourão, P. R. (2021). Fiscal Transparency and Tax Ethics: Does Better Information Lead to Greater Compliance? Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(5), 1031–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.06.003

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The {DeLone} and {McLean} model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Dewani, S., & Setiyawati, H. (2025). Tax Digitalization and Cooperative Compliance: A Trust-Mediated Model of Tax Compliance: Study of Corporate Taxpayers Registered with Kanwil DJP Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 13(4), 955–960. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i4.3842

Fitria, G. N., Murwaningsari, E., & Mulyani, S. D. (2024). Does Tax Compliance Intention Mediate the Determinant of Tax Compliance? Evidence:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2} = {Fitria, Giawan Nur and Murwaningsari, Etty and Mulyani, Susi Dwi}, journal = {Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental}, year = {2024}, v. Revista de Gesto Social e Ambiental, 2(18), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n6-056

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023). Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision-Making. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13483

Gupta, P., Hooda, A., Jeyaraj, A., Seddon, J. J. M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Trust, Risk, Privacy and Security in E-Government Use: Insights from a MASEM Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(3), 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10497-8

Habibah, M., Kusuma, I. C., & Aziz, A. J. (2024). The Effect of Taxpayer Awareness, Socialization, Sanctions and Accountability on Motor Vehicle Taxpayer Compliance. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 12(6), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v12i6.1612

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. In European Business Review (Vol. 31, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hayati, N., Syahdan, S. A., Fahrianta, R. Y., & Boedi, S. (2025). The Influence of Trust in the Government on Tax Compliance with the Perception of Tax Fairness as A Mediating Variable. International Journal of Trends in Accounting Research (IJTAR), 6(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.54951/ijtar.v6i2.1202

Hsu, H.-Y. (2023). Fiscal Transparency and Tax Morale: Is the Relationship Shaped by Perceptions of Government Performance and Corruption? International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231220599

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008a). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance : The ‘“ slippery slope ”’ framework. 29, 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008b). Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The ``Slippery Slope’’ Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140. https://doi.org/10.1037/13613-000

Nurhayati, Maksum, A., Siregar, N. B., & Nasution, F. N. (2025). Determinant Factor of Individual Taxpayer Compliance in Indonesia: Integrates of TPB Theory and Social Identity Theory. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(11), 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18110595

Ristiyana, R., Zaqiyah, E. R., & Husnaini, W. (2025). Taxpayer Compliance: Subjective Norms, Public Trust, and Trust in Tax Authorities. JRAMB, 11(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.26486/jramb.v11i2.4572

Saptono, P. B., Hodžić, S., Khozen, I., Mahmud, G., Pratiwi, I., Purwanto, D., Aditama, M. A., Haq, N., & Khodijah, S. (2023a). Quality of e-tax system and tax compliance intention: The mediating role of user satisfaction. Informatics, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010022

Saptono, P. B., Hodžić, S., Khozen, I., Mahmud, G., Pratiwi, I., Purwanto, D., Aditama, M. A., Haq, N., & Khodijah, S. (2023b). Quality of E-Tax System and Tax Compliance Intention: The Mediating Role of User Satisfaction. Informatics, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010022

Wulanningrat, N. D., & Rachmawati, S. (2023). Pengaruh Tax Socialization dan Tax Fairness T erhadap Tax Compliance dengan Tax Awareness Sebagai Variabel Intervening. 2(09), 1685–1699.

Yulianti, S., & Rachmawati, S. (2019). Tax Minimization Sebagai Pemoderasi Pada Pengaruh Tunnelling Incentive dan Debt Convenant Terhadap Ketetapan Transfer Pricing. JABI (Jurnal Akuntansi Berkelanjutan Indonesia), 2(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.32493/JABI.v2i2.y2019.p165-179

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Lumbantobing, S. P., Adwimurti, Y., Murwaningsih, E., & Rosli, M. H. bin. (2026). DIGITAL TAX ADMINISTRATION QUALITY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND CORPORATE COMPLIANCE INTENTION: THE MODERATING ROLE OF TRANSPARENCY CONCERN. Veredas Do Direito, 23(11), e235160. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5160